Skip to content

Premature Atrial Contractions

Premature atrial contractions (PACs), also known as atrial premature beats or atrial ectopy, are common cardiac arrhythmias characterized by an early electrical impulse originating in the atria, outside the heart’s natural pacemaker (sinoatrial node). This premature impulse causes the atria to contract earlier than expected, disrupting the normal heart rhythm. Individuals may experience PACs as a “skipped beat,” “fluttering,” “pounding,” or an irregular heartbeat. While often benign and asymptomatic, PACs can sometimes lead to noticeable symptoms and may indicate underlying cardiac conditions or an increased risk for more severe arrhythmias.

The biological basis of PACs involves abnormal electrical activity within the atrial muscle. While the exact mechanisms can vary, they often relate to localized areas of increased excitability or re-entrant electrical pathways in the atria. Genetic factors play a significant role in an individual’s susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias, including PACs. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified specific genetic loci associated with supraventricular ectopy, a broad category that includes PACs[1]. These genetic variations can influence the function of ion channels, which are critical for regulating the heart’s electrical impulses, or impact cardiac development and structure. Furthermore, PACs are often considered precursors to or triggers for atrial fibrillation (AF), a more common and clinically significant arrhythmia. Research has uncovered numerous genetic variants and loci associated with an increased risk of AF [2]. For example, variants in genes such as ZFHX3 and KCNN3 have been linked to AF susceptibility [2].

Clinically, while isolated PACs are generally harmless, frequent or symptomatic PACs warrant attention. They can cause symptoms like palpitations, lightheadedness, or shortness of breath, impacting an individual’s quality of life. More importantly, PACs are recognized as a risk factor for the development of sustained atrial fibrillation[3]. Atrial fibrillation is a major public health concern due to its association with an increased risk of stroke, heart failure, and other cardiovascular complications. Understanding the genetic predispositions to PACs and their progression to AF is crucial for early risk stratification and potential preventative strategies.

The social importance of premature atrial contractions extends beyond individual symptoms. Given their link to atrial fibrillation, PACs contribute to the broader burden of cardiovascular disease. Frequent or symptomatic PACs can lead to anxiety and impact daily activities. From a public health perspective, identifying individuals at higher genetic risk for PACs and subsequent AF could enable more targeted monitoring and interventions, potentially reducing the incidence of AF and its associated complications. This genetic insight contributes to the growing field of precision medicine for heart rhythm disorders, aiming to improve diagnostics, treatment, and patient outcomes globally.

Understanding the genetic and environmental factors contributing to premature atrial contractions (PACs) faces several inherent limitations, many of which are common to complex cardiovascular traits. While significant progress has been made, particularly through insights gained from related conditions like atrial fibrillation, challenges in phenotype definition, population diversity, and the complex etiology of these arrhythmias persist.

Challenges in Phenotype Definition and Measurement

Section titled “Challenges in Phenotype Definition and Measurement”

The transient and often asymptomatic nature of premature atrial contractions presents significant challenges for consistent and precise phenotyping across studies. The difficulty in comprehensively capturing these sporadic events can lead to misclassification or underestimation of their true prevalence and impact. Analogous to issues observed in studies of other cardiac traits, the method and timing of measurement can vary substantially; for instance, averaging physiological traits over extended periods using different equipment, as highlighted in some research, can introduce regression dilution bias and mask age-dependent genetic effects, potentially obscuring true associations for dynamic phenotypes like PACs[4]. Furthermore, some genetic studies may group PACs within broader categories like supraventricular ectopy, which, while useful for identifying general arrhythmia loci, may dilute specific associations unique to PACs[1].

Limitations in Ancestral Diversity and Generalizability

Section titled “Limitations in Ancestral Diversity and Generalizability”

A notable limitation in the genetic understanding of PACs, mirroring that of many complex traits, is the historical overrepresentation of individuals of European ancestry in large-scale genetic association studies [4]. This ancestral bias means that genetic variants and risk associations identified in these cohorts may not be directly transferable or generalizable to populations of other ancestries, whose genetic architectures and allele frequencies can differ significantly. While there is a growing effort to conduct multi-ethnic genome-wide association studies for cardiac conditions like atrial fibrillation, which may eventually inform PAC research, a comprehensive and equitable understanding across all global populations remains an ongoing endeavor [5]. Consequently, findings from predominantly European cohorts necessitate careful validation in more diverse populations to ensure broad applicability.

Unexplained Genetic Architecture and Environmental Complexity

Section titled “Unexplained Genetic Architecture and Environmental Complexity”

Despite the identification of numerous genetic loci associated with cardiac arrhythmias, a substantial portion of the heritability for conditions such as atrial fibrillation remains unexplained, indicating similar gaps in our understanding of PACs [6]. This “missing heritability” suggests that many contributing genetic variants, particularly those with small effect sizes or rare frequencies, may still await discovery, requiring even larger sample sizes and advanced analytical approaches. The intricate interplay between genetic predispositions and environmental factors, including lifestyle, comorbidities, and other confounders, also significantly contributes to PAC risk; however, systematically measuring and integrating these complex gene-environment interactions into genetic analyses remains a formidable challenge. While proteo-genomic approaches using pQTLs offer a valuable tool for prioritizing candidate genes at established risk loci, the full mechanistic pathways from genetic variant to the development of PACs often require further elucidation[7]. Moreover, the stringent statistical significance thresholds applied in genome-wide association studies, while crucial for minimizing false positives, may inadvertently overlook variants with subtle but genuine effects if studies are underpowered [8].

Genetic variants play a crucial role in influencing an individual’s susceptibility to premature atrial contractions (PACs) and other cardiac arrhythmias like atrial fibrillation (AF). These variants can impact genes involved in cardiac electrical signaling, structural integrity, and developmental processes, thereby altering heart function. Understanding these genetic influences provides insight into the underlying mechanisms of irregular heart rhythms.

Variants in the SCN5A gene, such as rs9824157 , rs7373862 , and rs3924120 , are particularly significant due to SCN5A’s role in encoding the alpha subunit of the cardiac sodium channel. This channel is essential for the initiation and propagation of electrical impulses in the heart, determining the speed of conduction and the excitability of cardiac cells. Genetic variations inSCN5A have been linked to alterations in the PR interval, a measure of electrical conduction from the atria to the ventricles, highlighting its impact on cardiac electrical activity [6]. The gene is recognized as a key component of cardiac ion channels that govern heart rhythm [9], and its dysfunction can lead to various arrhythmias, including PACs, by affecting the precise timing of atrial depolarization.

Other genes, including CDKN1A, NDNF, and PRDM5, contribute to the cellular and developmental processes that underpin cardiac health. The CDKN1A gene, associated with rs3176326 , encodes a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, which plays a vital role in cell cycle regulation, growth, and differentiation. While not directly linked to electrical activity, proper cell cycle control is essential for cardiac development and repair, where dysregulation could compromise tissue integrity and contribute to arrhythmogenesis. Research indicates that regulatory elements involved in cardiac development are often implicated in atrial fibrillation [9]. Similarly, NDNF (Neuron Derived Neurotrophic Factor), with variant rs201707169 , and PRDM5 (PR Domain Zinc Finger Protein 5), associated with rs149579563 , are involved in cell signaling and differentiation, respectively. PRDM5 acts as a transcription factor, influencing gene expression patterns critical for the proper formation and function of cardiac tissues, and transcription factors are known to underlie common arrhythmias [10].

A group of zinc finger protein genes, including ZNF440 (rs61742511 ), ZNF433 and its antisense RNA ZNF433-AS1 (rs141290229 ), and ZNF69 (rs112864842 ), are primarily involved in gene regulation. Zinc finger proteins typically function as transcription factors, binding to DNA to control the expression of other genes. Variants in these genes can alter the intricate networks of gene expression necessary for cardiac development, structure, and electrical function. Such alterations may lead to subtle or overt changes in cardiac cell properties, contributing to an environment conducive to PACs. The binding of transcription factors is a critical regulatory mechanism, often highlighted by variants affecting enhancer regions in cardiac tissues [9].

Finally, genes like RNU6-334P, DPP10, and LSAMP represent diverse functions that can indirectly influence cardiac rhythm. RNU6-334P, with variants like rs62362059 , rs144451752 , and rs62363560 , is a small nuclear RNA involved in RNA splicing, a fundamental process for producing functional proteins. Errors in splicing can affect a wide array of cardiac proteins, including ion channels and structural components. DPP10 (Dipeptidyl Peptidase Like 10), linked to rs147808220 , is known to modulate potassium channels, thereby impacting cardiac repolarization and excitability, which are vital for maintaining a stable heart rhythm[10]. LSAMP (Limbic System Associated Membrane Protein), with variants rs74918516 and rs77970771 , although primarily associated with neuronal functions, also plays a role in cell adhesion and structural organization. Maintaining the structural integrity of cardiac tissue is crucial for proper electrical conduction and preventing re-entrant arrhythmias, with several structural genes being implicated in cardiac conditions [9].

RS IDGeneRelated Traits
rs3176326 CDKN1Aatrial fibrillation
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
QRS duration
PR interval
electrocardiography
rs9824157
rs7373862
rs3924120
SCN5Apremature atrial contractions
heart rate
rs62362059
rs144451752
rs62363560
NIHCOLE - RNU6-334Ppremature atrial contractions
rs201707169 NDNFpremature atrial contractions
rs149579563 PRDM5 - NDNFpremature atrial contractions
rs61742511 ZNF440premature atrial contractions
rs141290229 ZNF433-AS1, ZNF433premature atrial contractions
rs112864842 ZNF69premature atrial contractions
rs147808220 DPP10 - MTCYBP39premature atrial contractions
rs74918516
rs77970771
LSAMPinsomnia
premature atrial contractions

Premature atrial contractions (PACs) arise from a complex interplay of genetic predispositions, environmental factors, and physiological stressors that collectively destabilize normal atrial electrical activity. These ectopic beats, originating outside the heart’s primary pacemaker, can be influenced by inherited susceptibilities, external triggers, and age-related changes in cardiac structure and function.

Genetic Predisposition and Cardiac Development

Section titled “Genetic Predisposition and Cardiac Development”

Genetic factors play a substantial role in the susceptibility to premature atrial contractions (PACs) and other atrial arrhythmias. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified specific genetic loci associated with supraventricular ectopy, a category that includes PACs[1]. Beyond direct links to ectopy, common genetic variants found to predispose individuals to atrial fibrillation (AF), a related atrial arrhythmia, also suggest a broader genetic vulnerability to atrial electrical instability [6]. These inherited variants can influence the function of ion channels and structural proteins, thereby altering cardiac electrical properties and creating an inherent predisposition to ectopic atrial activity.

The molecular pathways influenced by these genetic factors often involve critical aspects of cardiac development and cellular function. For instance, variants in genes such as ZFHX3 and KCNN3, identified in studies on atrial fibrillation, point to their roles in maintaining normal atrial rhythm and development [2]. Insights from proteo-genomic analyses, which map genetic variants to protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs), further help prioritize candidate genes at established risk loci, elucidating how genetic differences manifest at the protein level to influence atrial electrophysiology and structural integrity [7]. These developmental and molecular underpinnings can create a subtle, pro-arrhythmic substrate within the atria, increasing the likelihood of PACs.

Environmental factors serve as important modulators and triggers for premature atrial contractions, often interacting with an individual’s genetic background. While specific lifestyle factors for PACs are not extensively detailed in the provided research, studies on atrial fibrillation indicate that multiple risk factors contribute to atrial arrhythmias[11]. Acute physiological stressors, such as those encountered during or immediately after surgical procedures, represent potent environmental triggers. For example, the phenomenon of new-onset atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery demonstrates how significant physiological stress can precipitate atrial arrhythmias [3].

The interaction between an individual’s genetic predisposition and environmental stimuli is critical in determining the manifestation of PACs. Genetic variants may confer varying degrees of susceptibility to environmental influences, meaning that certain genetic profiles might render individuals more vulnerable to developing premature atrial contractions when exposed to specific stressors or lifestyle factors. Although detailed mechanisms of gene-environment interactions for PACs are not fully elaborated in the provided context, the principle highlights that both inherited susceptibility and external factors converge to influence the risk and frequency of these ectopic beats.

Section titled “Comorbidities, Physiological Stress, and Age-Related Atrial Remodeling”

The presence of various comorbidities significantly contributes to the incidence of premature atrial contractions by creating a more arrhythmogenic atrial substrate. Conditions that induce progressive atrial remodeling are particularly relevant, as they lead to electrical dissociation and localized conduction heterogeneities within the atrial tissue[11]. This remodeling process can facilitate re-entry pathways and promote the perpetuation of arrhythmias, making the atria inherently more susceptible to ectopic firing.

Age is a primary intrinsic factor influencing the likelihood of PACs, as the heart undergoes structural and electrical changes over time. Age-related atrial remodeling involves processes such as fibrosis, inflammation, and alterations in ion channel expression, all of which contribute to an increasingly pro-arrhythmic environment[11]. This progressive remodeling, alongside the cumulative effects of comorbidities and other physiological stressors, creates a complex interplay where both inherent aging processes and external influences converge to increase the risk and frequency of premature atrial contractions.

Premature atrial contractions (PACs), also known as atrial premature beats or supraventricular ectopy, are common cardiac arrhythmias characterized by an early electrical impulse originating from an ectopic focus within the atria, outside of the sinoatrial node[1]. While often benign, frequent PACs can be a precursor or indicator of more significant atrial arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation (AF) [12]. Understanding the underlying biological mechanisms involves exploring complex interactions at molecular, cellular, tissue, and systemic levels.

Electrophysiological Basis and Atrial Remodeling

Section titled “Electrophysiological Basis and Atrial Remodeling”

Premature atrial contractions arise from abnormal electrical activity within the atrial myocardium, where an irritable focus spontaneously depolarizes before the regular sinus beat[1]. This ectopic firing disrupts the heart’s normal rhythm and can initiate a cascade of events that contribute to progressive atrial remodeling. Atrial remodeling encompasses both structural and electrical changes, leading to alterations in atrial tissue properties [11]. These changes include electrical dissociation and local conduction heterogeneities, which create an environment conducive to re-entry circuits and the perpetuation of more sustained arrhythmias like atrial fibrillation [11]. Such remodeling can result in an irregular and often abnormally fast heart rate, reflecting a disruption in the normal homeostatic control of cardiac rhythm.

Genetic Architecture and Cardiac Development

Section titled “Genetic Architecture and Cardiac Development”

Genetic mechanisms play a substantial role in an individual’s susceptibility to developing premature atrial contractions and more severe atrial arrhythmias, with atrial fibrillation demonstrating significant heritability[13]. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous genetic risk loci associated with atrial fibrillation and related cardiac traits, highlighting the polygenic nature of these conditions [9]. These identified loci often point to biological pathways and regulatory elements critical for proper cardiac development, suggesting that subtle developmental abnormalities or predispositions in atrial structure and function can increase arrhythmia risk [9]. Variations in genes affecting ion channel function, cardiac structural integrity, and cell-to-cell communication are implicated, influencing the electrical stability and mechanical properties of the atrial tissue [6].

Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Electrical Instability

Section titled “Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Electrical Instability”

At the molecular and cellular levels, the precise regulation of ion flow across cardiomyocyte membranes is paramount for normal cardiac electrical activity. Key biomolecules, such as specific ion channels, are critical; for instance, common variants in the KCNN3gene, which encodes a small-conductance calcium-activated potassium channel, have been associated with atrial fibrillation[6]. Dysfunctional ion channels can alter the action potential duration and refractoriness of atrial myocytes, leading to increased cellular excitability and the spontaneous generation of ectopic beats [11]. Beyond ion channels, other critical proteins, enzymes, receptors, and transcription factors involved in intracellular calcium handling, gap junction formation, and metabolic pathways contribute to complex regulatory networks that govern atrial myocyte function and electrical coupling [14]. Disruptions in these intricate signaling pathways and metabolic processes can lead to impaired impulse conduction or enhanced automaticity, thereby creating the substrate for premature atrial contractions.

Systemic Influences and Homeostatic Disruptions

Section titled “Systemic Influences and Homeostatic Disruptions”

The predisposition to premature atrial contractions is not solely determined by intrinsic cardiac factors but is also influenced by broader tissue-level interactions and systemic conditions. Genetic loci associated with left atrial volume and function have been identified, suggesting that structural characteristics of the atria can significantly impact arrhythmia risk[15]. Furthermore, systemic factors, including various metabolic determinants, play a crucial role in influencing overall atrial health and the propensity for electrical disturbances [11]. Disruptions to homeostatic processes, such as chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, or other metabolic imbalances, can contribute to progressive atrial remodeling, which in turn establishes an arrhythmogenic substrate for ectopic activity and the development of more persistent arrhythmias [11]. The interplay between an individual’s genetic predispositions, cellular-level dysfunctions, and the influence of systemic stressors collectively dictates the risk and clinical manifestation of premature atrial contractions.

Premature atrial contractions (PACs) arise from complex interactions across genetic predispositions, cellular signaling, metabolic processes, and systems-level atrial remodeling. These mechanisms collectively contribute to increased atrial excitability and the generation of ectopic beats.

Genetic Predisposition and Transcriptional Control

Section titled “Genetic Predisposition and Transcriptional Control”

Multiple genome-wide association studies have identified genetic variants and risk loci associated with atrial fibrillation, a condition often preceded or triggered by premature atrial contractions[9]. These identified loci frequently highlight biological pathways and regulatory elements critical for normal cardiac development and function [9]. Dysregulation of these genes, potentially through altered transcription factor activity or post-translational modifications, can lead to abnormal protein expression and function, thereby creating a substrate for increased atrial excitability and the spontaneous generation of premature atrial contractions. The integration of genetic, transcriptional, and functional analyses is crucial for pinpointing novel genes whose altered regulation can predispose individuals to such atrial arrhythmias[13].

Cellular Signaling and Electrophysiological Instability

Section titled “Cellular Signaling and Electrophysiological Instability”

The precise electrical activity of the atria, essential for a regular heart rhythm, is intricately governed by cellular signaling pathways. Activation of various receptors, for instance by neurohormonal factors like angiotensin II, can trigger intracellular signaling cascades that modulate ion channel function and overall cellular excitability othelial function and treadmill exercise responses. Alterations within these cascades, such as those involving cGMP, can lead to an unstable resting membrane potential or enhanced automaticity in atrial cardiomyocytes. Such electrophysiological instability promotes spontaneous depolarizations that manifest as premature atrial contractions, disrupting the normal rhythmic contractions and potentially initiating more sustained arrhythmias.

Metabolic Determinants and Energy Homeostasis

Section titled “Metabolic Determinants and Energy Homeostasis”

Metabolic pathways are fundamental for maintaining the structural and electrical integrity of atrial cells. Research indicates that genetic and metabolic determinants contribute to atrial fibrillation, implying that metabolic dysregulation can foster an arrhythmogenic environment conducive to premature atrial contractions[11]. Impaired energy metabolism, characterized by insufficient ATP production or inefficient utilization, can compromise the function of ion pumps and other critical cellular processes, leading to electrical instability. Furthermore, imbalances in the biosynthesis or catabolism of essential molecules can impact the overall health and functional capacity of atrial tissue, increasing its susceptibility to ectopic electrical activity.

Atrial Remodeling and Network Dysregulation

Section titled “Atrial Remodeling and Network Dysregulation”

Premature atrial contractions are frequently associated with, and can contribute to, a broader phenomenon known as atrial remodeling, which involves progressive structural and electrical changes within the atria[11]. This remodeling process is driven by complex pathway crosstalk and network interactions, where dysregulation in one molecular pathway can cascade and affect multiple others, thereby creating a pro-arrhythmic substrate. For example, genetic variants influencing left atrial volume and function play a role in this remodeling [15]. These systems-level changes, including the development of electrical dissociation and local conduction heterogeneities, contribute to the emergent property of increased atrial excitability, making the atria more prone to generating premature beats and potentially transitioning into more severe arrhythmias like atrial fibrillation [11].

Premature atrial contractions (PACs), also known as supraventricular ectopy, are common cardiac arrhythmias with significant clinical implications for patient care and risk stratification. Their presence can signal underlying cardiac vulnerabilities and serve as a prognostic indicator for more serious conditions.

Prognostic Significance and Atrial Fibrillation Risk

Section titled “Prognostic Significance and Atrial Fibrillation Risk”

Premature atrial contractions are a frequently observed form of supraventricular ectopy in the general population, and their occurrence is a notable risk factor for future cardiovascular events[12]. The presence of PACs carries significant prognostic value due to its strong association with the development of atrial fibrillation (AF), a more severe and sustained arrhythmia [12]. This link positions PACs as an important early marker, identifying individuals who may be at an elevated risk for AF progression.

The progression from PACs to AF is often linked to progressive atrial remodeling, which can lead to electrical dissociation and localized conduction heterogeneities within the atrial tissue [11]. This altered atrial substrate creates an environment conducive to re-entry circuits, which are critical in the perpetuation of AF and its characteristic irregular, often rapid heart rate [11]. Furthermore, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple genetic susceptibility loci for AF, with some variants likely contributing to the predisposition for PACs [6]. Specific genetic variants in genes such as ZFHX3 and KCNN3 have been associated with an increased risk of both prevalent and incident AF, suggesting a shared genetic basis that may initially manifest as PACs before the onset of overt AF [2].

Clinical Assessment and Risk Stratification

Section titled “Clinical Assessment and Risk Stratification”

The detection of premature atrial contractions holds considerable diagnostic utility, playing a crucial role in the comprehensive risk assessment for atrial fibrillation. Standard diagnostic tools, including routine electrocardiograms and extended Holter monitoring, are essential for identifying PACs and quantifying their burden, which helps in stratifying patients based on their arrhythmic risk[1]. Identifying individuals with frequent PACs allows healthcare providers to consider personalized medicine approaches, potentially focusing on tailored preventative strategies or enhanced monitoring for those at a higher risk of developing AF [7].

Risk stratification for AF can be significantly enhanced by integrating genetic insights with traditional clinical risk factors. Large-scale genome-wide analyses have pinpointed genetic variants that influence cardiac structure and function, including critical parameters like left atrial volume, which are directly implicated in AF pathogenesis [15]. These genetic markers, when combined with PAC frequency, can help identify high-risk individuals who could benefit from early interventions or lifestyle modifications aimed at preventing AF, such as managing associated comorbidities[12]. The presence of PACs is also particularly relevant in specific patient populations, such as those undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery, given the known risk of new-onset postoperative AF in this setting and the potential role of genetic factors [3].

Underlying Mechanisms and Associated Conditions

Section titled “Underlying Mechanisms and Associated Conditions”

The etiology of premature atrial contractions and their progression to atrial fibrillation is multifaceted, involving a complex interplay of genetic predispositions and environmental factors. Genome-wide association studies have successfully identified numerous genetic loci implicated in AF, with a subset of these likely contributing to the susceptibility for supraventricular ectopy[6]. These studies highlight specific biological pathways and regulatory elements involved in cardiac development and function, suggesting that subtle, genetically influenced structural or electrical abnormalities can predispose individuals to PACs and subsequently to AF [9]. The recognized heritability of atrial fibrillation further emphasizes the significant genetic component influencing these cardiac arrhythmias [13].

Beyond genetic factors, PACs are frequently associated with several comorbidities and specific clinical conditions. Obstructive sleep apnea, for example, has been identified as a condition linked to premature supraventricular contractions, indicating it may act as a trigger or an exacerbating factor for these arrhythmias[16]. Similarly, patients undergoing hemodialysis often exhibit a higher incidence of various cardiac arrhythmias, including PACs, suggesting that systemic factors such as electrolyte imbalances or fluid overload contribute to atrial ectopy in this vulnerable population [17]. A thorough understanding of these associations is crucial for providing comprehensive patient care, enabling the targeted management of underlying conditions that can influence the frequency, severity, and overall clinical impact of PACs [16].

Frequently Asked Questions About Premature Atrial Contractions

Section titled “Frequently Asked Questions About Premature Atrial Contractions”

These questions address the most important and specific aspects of premature atrial contractions based on current genetic research.


Yes, there’s a good chance you might. Genetic factors play a significant role in your susceptibility to PACs. Specific genetic variations can influence how your heart’s electrical system works, making you more prone to these extra beats. While not a guarantee, family history is a strong indicator of increased risk.

2. Why do my PACs feel so bad, but my friend’s don’t bother them?

Section titled “2. Why do my PACs feel so bad, but my friend’s don’t bother them?”

How you perceive PACs can be quite personal, and genetics may play a role in this too. While PACs stem from abnormal electrical activity, your individual genetic makeup can influence your heart’s excitability and how sensitive you are to these rhythm changes. Some people are genetically predisposed to feel symptoms more acutely, while others remain asymptomatic.

3. Is there a genetic test that can tell me my risk for PACs?

Section titled “3. Is there a genetic test that can tell me my risk for PACs?”

While there isn’t one specific test just for PACs, research is advancing rapidly. Genome-wide association studies have identified genetic markers linked to supraventricular ectopy, a broad category that includes PACs. Understanding your genetic predispositions could eventually help in early risk assessment and more personalized monitoring strategies.

4. If I have PACs, will I definitely get atrial fibrillation?

Section titled “4. If I have PACs, will I definitely get atrial fibrillation?”

Not necessarily, but it does increase your risk. PACs are considered a risk factor and can act as triggers for atrial fibrillation (AF). Your genetic profile further influences this, as many variants linked to AF susceptibility, like those in ZFHX3 and KCNN3, can also impact your overall cardiac electrical stability.

5. Does my ancestry affect my risk for extra heartbeats?

Section titled “5. Does my ancestry affect my risk for extra heartbeats?”

Yes, your ancestry can definitely influence your genetic risk for PACs. Much of the research identifying genetic variants has focused on individuals of European descent. This means that genetic risk factors and their frequencies can differ significantly across various populations, making ancestry an important consideration for your personal risk profile.

6. Does getting older make my PACs worse because of my genes?

Section titled “6. Does getting older make my PACs worse because of my genes?”

Age can certainly influence the manifestation and severity of PACs. While genetic predispositions are present throughout life, their effects might interact with age-related changes in your heart’s structure and function. This complex interplay means that genetic influences can become more apparent or impactful as you get older.

While genetics significantly contribute to your susceptibility, lifestyle choices can play a preventative role. Understanding your genetic predisposition allows for targeted monitoring and interventions, which, combined with healthy habits, may help reduce the risk of PACs progressing to more severe arrhythmias like atrial fibrillation.

8. Do my PACs affect my concentration or energy at work?

Section titled “8. Do my PACs affect my concentration or energy at work?”

Yes, if your PACs are frequent or cause noticeable symptoms, they can certainly impact your daily life, including work. Symptoms like palpitations, lightheadedness, or shortness of breath can lead to anxiety and disrupt your focus and overall energy levels.

9. Does stress make my heart skip a beat more often?

Section titled “9. Does stress make my heart skip a beat more often?”

Stress is a common trigger for many physiological responses, and while the underlying cause of PACs is electrical, your body’s response to stress could influence their frequency. Genetically, some individuals might have an increased excitability in their atrial muscle, making them more prone to PACs when experiencing stress or anxiety.

10. Why do some people never get PACs despite family history?

Section titled “10. Why do some people never get PACs despite family history?”

Genetics aren’t the only factor; they create a predisposition rather than a certainty. While specific genetic variants increase susceptibility, the overall picture is complex, involving many genes with small effects and environmental influences. Some individuals might simply have a protective combination of other genetic factors or beneficial lifestyle choices.


This FAQ was automatically generated based on current genetic research and may be updated as new information becomes available.

Disclaimer: This information is for educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a healthcare provider for personalized medical guidance.

[1] Napier MD, et al. “Genome-wide association study and meta-analysis identify loci associated with ventricular and supraventricular ectopy.”Sci Rep, vol. 7, no. 1, Apr. 2017, p. 4543. PMID: 29618737.

[2] Benjamin, E. J., et al. “Variants in ZFHX3 are associated with atrial fibrillation in individuals of European ancestry.” Nat Genet, 2009. PMID: 19597492.

[3] Kertai, M. D., et al. “Genome-wide association study of new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.” American Heart Journal, vol. 170, no. 5, 2015, pp. 917–923.e1.

[4] Vasan, Ramachandran S., et al. “Genome-wide association of echocardiographic dimensions, brachial artery endothelial function and treadmill exercise responses in the Framingham Heart Study.”BMC Med Genet, vol. 8, suppl. 1, 2007, p. S2.

[5] Roselli C, et al. “Multi-ethnic genome-wide association study for atrial fibrillation.” Nat Genet, vol. 50, no. 9, Sept. 2018, pp. 1225-1233. PMID: 29892015.

[6] Ellinor PT, et al. “Meta-analysis identifies six new susceptibility loci for atrial fibrillation.” Nat Genet, vol. 44, no. 6, May 2012, pp. 670-675. PMID: 22544366.

[7] Pietzner, M, et al. “Mapping the proteo-genomic convergence of human diseases.” Science, vol. 374, no. 6571, 2021, pp. eabj1541.

[8] Srinivasan, Lakshmi, et al. “Genome-wide association study of sepsis in extremely premature infants.” Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, vol. 102, no. 5, 2017, pp. F420-F425.

[9] Nielsen JB, et al. “Genome-wide Study of Atrial Fibrillation Identifies Seven Risk Loci and Highlights Biological Pathways and Regulatory Elements Involved in Cardiac Development.” Am J Hum Genet, vol. 102, no. 2, Feb. 2018, pp. 219-233. PMID: 29290336.

[10] Christophersen IE, et al. “Large-scale analyses of common and rare variants identify 12 new loci associated with atrial fibrillation.” Nat Genet, vol. 49, no. 6, June 2017, pp. 955-962. PMID: 28416818.

[11] Emmert DB, et al. “Genetic and Metabolic Determinants of Atrial Fibrillation in a General Population Sample: The CHRIS Study.” Biomolecules, vol. 11, no. 11, Nov. 2021, p. 1663. PMID: 34827661.

[12] Conen D, et al. “Premature atrial contractions in the general population: frequency and risk factors.”Circulation, vol. 126, no. 19, Nov. 2012, pp. 2302-2308. PMID: 23028132.

[13] Weng LC, et al. “Heritability of Atrial Fibrillation.” Circ Cardiovasc Genet, vol. 10, no. 6, Dec. 2017, pp. e001695. PMID: 29237688.

[14] Sinner MF, et al. “Integrating genetic, transcriptional, and functional analyses to identify five novel genes for atrial fibrillation.” Circulation, vol. 130, no. 15, Oct. 2014, pp. 1225-1235. PMID: 25124494.

[15] Ahlberg G, et al. “Genome-wide association study identifies 18 novel loci associated with left atrial volume and function.” Eur Heart J, vol. 42, no. 45, Dec. 2021, pp. 4523-4532. PMID: 34338756.

[16] Kawano, Y., et al. “Association between obstructive sleep apnea and premature supraventricular contractions.”Journal of Cardiology, vol. 63, no. 1, 2014, pp. 69–72.

[17] Kimura, K., et al. “Cardiac arrhythmias in hemodialysis patients. A study of incidence and contributory factors.” Nephron, vol. 53, no. 3, 1989, pp. 201–207.