Skip to content

Percent Glycated Albumin

Percent glycated albumin (GA) is a significant biomarker used to assess average blood glucose levels. It represents the proportion of serum albumin, the most abundant protein in blood plasma, that has become irreversibly bound to glucose molecules through a non-enzymatic process known as glycation.[1]This biomarker offers a measure of glycemic control over a shorter timeframe, typically reflecting glucose exposure over the preceding two to four weeks, in contrast to glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), which provides an average over two to three months.[1]The biological basis of percent glycated albumin lies in the direct interaction between glucose and albumin in the bloodstream. Albumin is primarily produced in the liver.[1]The “percent” calculation adjusts for variations in total serum albumin concentration, aiming to provide a more accurate reflection of circulating glucose levels independent of albumin turnover.[1]Genetic factors are known to influence various glycemic traits, and recent research has begun to characterize genetic variants associated with percent glycated albumin. For instance, the missense mutationrs1260326 (also known as rs343480 ) in the GCKRgene, which is primarily expressed in the liver, has been significantly associated with lower levels of percent glycated albumin.[1] Other variants, such as rs34459162 in RCN3 and rs59443763 in PRKCA, have also shown associations.[1]These genetic insights suggest that while some genetic influences on percent glycated albumin may overlap with those affecting fasting glucose, others might be distinct from those impacting HbA1c, particularly due to the different biological pathways involved (e.g., liver-specific factors for albumin versus erythrocyte factors for hemoglobin).[1]Clinically, percent glycated albumin serves as a valuable complementary tool for monitoring glycemic control, particularly in situations where HbA1c measurements may be unreliable. This includes individuals with conditions affecting red blood cell lifespan or hemoglobin structure, such as anemia, hemoglobinopathies, or kidney disease, where HbA1c can be falsely elevated or lowered.[1] While not as frequently used in the U.S., it is widely adopted in Japan and other countries to monitor short-term glycemic fluctuations and assess diabetes risk and complications.[1]Understanding the genetic underpinnings of percent glycated albumin can enhance its clinical utility, potentially leading to more personalized approaches in diabetes management and risk assessment.

The social importance of percent glycated albumin stems from its potential to improve global health outcomes related to diabetes. By offering an alternative or complementary biomarker to HbA1c, it can help address diagnostic and monitoring challenges in diverse populations, especially where specific genetic or hematological conditions affect traditional markers.[1]Insights into the genetic architecture of percent glycated albumin, including differences observed across ancestries, contribute to a more nuanced understanding of glucose metabolism and the variability in diabetes susceptibility and progression. This knowledge can facilitate the development of more accurate screening tools and targeted interventions, ultimately aiming to reduce the burden of diabetes and its complications worldwide.

Methodological and Statistical Constraints

Section titled “Methodological and Statistical Constraints”

A significant limitation in genetic studies of percent glycated albumin stems from methodological and statistical constraints, particularly concerning sample size and statistical power. Research indicates that limited sample sizes, especially in specific ancestral groups, can severely restrict the power to detect genetic associations, leading to an underestimation of the true genetic architecture of the trait . This variant is in strong linkage disequilibrium with other genetic markers associated with type 2 diabetes and fasting glucose, underscoring its role in glycemic control.[1] The GCKRprotein, primarily expressed in the liver, inhibits glucokinase activity, which in turn influences hepatic glucose output and serum glucose levels.[1]Beyond glucose regulation,rs1260326 and the GCKRgene are also associated with a range of other traits, including kidney disease, triglyceride levels, and Crohn disease, highlighting its broad metabolic impact.[1] In contrast, the intronic variant rs59443763 in the PRKCAgene is associated with higher percent glycated albumin levels. This variant shows a significant association in Black individuals, where each minor allele corresponds to a 5.4% increase in percent glycated albumin.[1] PRKCAencodes Protein Kinase C alpha, an enzyme central to many cellular signaling pathways, including those that can influence glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity. While this variant’s association with percent glycated albumin reached genome-wide significance in Black populations, it was not observed in white individuals or in trans-ancestry meta-analyses.[1] Further analysis indicated that this association became non-significant when individuals with undiagnosed diabetes were excluded from the study, suggesting its potential relevance to early glycemic dysregulation.[1]

Definition and Measurement of Percent Glycated Albumin

Section titled “Definition and Measurement of Percent Glycated Albumin”

Percent glycated albumin (GA) is a significant glycemic biomarker that quantifies the fraction of albumin in the blood that has undergone non-enzymatic glycation, where glucose molecules covalently bind to the albumin protein.[2]This glycation process provides a reflection of average blood glucose levels over a shorter period, typically 2-3 weeks, due to albumin’s relatively shorter half-life compared to glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).[2]The operational definition for calculating percent glycated albumin follows a specific manufacturer’s protocol:[(glycated albumin concentration in g/dL/serum albumin concentration in g/dL)*100/1.14] + 2.9.[1]The measurement of percent glycated albumin is typically performed on serum samples using automated systems, such as the Roche Modular P800, often employing specific reagents like GA-L from Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation.[1] This method involves the quantification of both the glycated fraction of albumin and the total serum albumin concentration, which are then used in the standardized formula to derive the final percentage.[1] This precise approach allows researchers to differentiate between genetic factors that specifically influence serum protein concentration and those primarily associated with hyperglycemia.[1]

Clinical Context and Significance as a Glycemic Marker

Section titled “Clinical Context and Significance as a Glycemic Marker”

Percent glycated albumin serves as an important glycemic control marker, offering valuable insights into short-term glycemic fluctuations and overall control.[2], [3]Its utility in the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes comes with both advantages and pitfalls, prompting ongoing discussions and re-examinations of various metrics for glucose control.[2], [3], [4], [5]While diabetes is fundamentally characterized by elevated blood glucose levels (hyperglycemia), glycated albumin provides a distinct temporal perspective on these glucose elevations compared to other established markers.[1]In clinical practice and research, percent glycated albumin is often evaluated alongside other glycemic biomarkers, including fructosamine, total glycated albumin, fasting glucose, and HbA1c.[1]Unlike HbA1c, which reflects average glucose over a 2-3 month period and is standardized to the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) assay.[1] glycated albumin provides a more recent snapshot of glycemic status. This comparative analysis is crucial for understanding the unique information each biomarker captures and their respective roles in the diagnosis, prognosis, and comprehensive management of diabetes.[3]

Genetic Influences and Interpretive Considerations

Section titled “Genetic Influences and Interpretive Considerations”

Genetic factors play a significant role in influencing percent glycated albumin levels, underscoring the necessity of investigating the genetic underpinnings of hyperglycemia biomarkers to fully understand the information they convey.[1]For instance, a novel missense single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)rs1260236 in the GCKRgene has been significantly associated with percent glycated albumin levels in individuals of white ancestry.[1] Although an intronic variant in PRKCA, rs59443763 , showed an association with percent glycated albumin in individuals of black ancestry, this finding did not replicate in subsequent studies.[1]These genetic studies indicate that percent glycated albumin levels are influenced by both glycemic and nonglycemic components.[1]This highlights that factors independent of direct glucose metabolism can affect its concentration, thereby impacting its clinical interpretation. A comprehensive understanding of these genetic and nonglycemic influences is essential for accurately assessing an individual’s glycemic status and for distinguishing between genetic predispositions impacting serum protein concentration versus those primarily affecting hyperglycemia.[1]

Percent glycated albumin levels are influenced by a complex interplay of genetic factors and physiological processes. These factors can affect either the concentration of glucose available for glycation or the dynamics of serum albumin itself, the protein to which glucose binds. Understanding these diverse causes is crucial for interpreting glycated albumin as a biomarker of glycemic control.

Genetic variants play a significant role in modulating an individual’s glucose metabolism, thereby indirectly affecting percent glycated albumin levels. For instance, thers1260326 variant, also known as rs343480 , in the _GCKR_gene is significantly associated with lower levels of percent glycated albumin in individuals of white ancestry. This gene is primarily expressed in the liver, a key organ responsible for regulating hepatic glucose output, indicating that this variant likely influences percent glycated albumin through its impact on glycemic pathways. The same_GCKR_variant has also been linked to other metabolic and health conditions, including kidney disease, triglyceride levels, and Crohn disease, underscoring its broad physiological relevance.[1]Beyond individual SNPs, a cumulative polygenic risk score, derived from multiple genetic variants known to affect fasting glucose levels, collectively accounts for a measurable portion of the variance in percent glycated albumin. This highlights how the combined effect of numerous genetic loci involved in glucose regulation contributes to an individual’s overall glycemic status, which is then reflected in the degree of albumin glycation.[1]

Genetic Factors Affecting Albumin and Protein Glycation

Section titled “Genetic Factors Affecting Albumin and Protein Glycation”

Genetic determinants can also influence percent glycated albumin through mechanisms that are independent of glucose metabolism, often referred to as nonglycemic pathways. For example, thers34459162 variant in the _RCN3_gene, which encodes reticulocalbin 3, has been associated with fructosamine and total glycated albumin in white populations. While this specific SNP was not directly linked to serum albumin levels in the primary analysis, a variant in perfect linkage disequilibrium (rs2280401 ) has been associated with total protein and serum albumin in other populations, suggesting an influence on the quantity of serum albumin available for glycation rather than on glucose levels themselves.[1] Similarly, the intergenic variant rs2438321 , located near the _CNTN5_gene, shows a significant association with serum albumin levels in black populations. Since percent glycated albumin is calculated as a ratio involving serum albumin concentration, genetic factors that alter the absolute amount of serum albumin can directly impact the resulting percentage of glycated albumin.[1] Furthermore, the rs59443763 variant in the _PRKCA_gene on chromosome 17 is associated with higher percent glycated albumin in black individuals, also showing links to fructosamine and total glycated albumin. This illustrates the diverse genetic influences on protein glycation that are distinct from those affecting red blood cell traits, which significantly impact_HbA1c_ levels but not glycated albumin.[1]

Broader Physiological and Comorbid Factors

Section titled “Broader Physiological and Comorbid Factors”

The fundamental cause of elevated percent glycated albumin is sustained hyperglycemia, as it directly reflects average glucose exposure over a period of approximately 2-4 weeks. Even in individuals without a formal diagnosis of diabetes, variations in glucose control contribute to the extent of albumin glycation, making it a valuable indicator of short-term glycemic status.[1]The liver plays a crucial role in determining percent glycated albumin levels, not only as an organ central to glucose metabolism but also as the primary site of albumin synthesis. Consequently, genetic factors with high expression in the liver, such as the_GCKR_gene, can exert a pronounced and direct influence on percent glycated albumin levels, distinguishing its causal pathways from other glycemic biomarkers that are more influenced by red blood cell characteristics.[1]

Percent glycated albumin is a crucial biomarker reflecting an individual’s average blood glucose levels over a shorter period compared to glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). This measure is derived from the non-enzymatic binding of glucose to albumin, the most abundant protein in human plasma. Understanding the various biological facets influencing percent glycated albumin involves delving into molecular interactions, metabolic pathways, genetic regulation, and systemic physiological impacts.

Molecular Mechanisms of Albumin Glycation and Its Role

Section titled “Molecular Mechanisms of Albumin Glycation and Its Role”

Albumin is a critical protein synthesized in the liver, serving diverse functions such as transporting nutrients, hormones, metabolic byproducts, and drugs throughout the body. It also plays a vital role in maintaining intravascular volume by generating oncotic pressure.[6]Glycated albumin forms through a non-enzymatic process where glucose molecules slowly attach to the N-terminal valine and internal lysine amino groups of albumin.[7]This process, known as non-enzymatic glycosylation, is directly proportional to the concentration of glucose in the blood.

As a glycemic marker, percent glycated albumin provides an integrated measure of glucose exposure over the preceding two to four weeks, a shorter timeframe than the two to three months reflected by HbA1c.[1]This shorter window makes it particularly useful for monitoring short-term glycemic control or in clinical situations where HbA1c measurements may be unreliable, such as in individuals with anemia or hemoglobinopathies.[1]The calculation of percent glycated albumin, which adjusts for total serum albumin concentration, helps to isolate the effect of glucose levels from variations in overall albumin levels.[1]

Hepatic Metabolism and Albumin Homeostasis

Section titled “Hepatic Metabolism and Albumin Homeostasis”

The liver is central to both albumin production and glucose metabolism, making it a key organ in determining percent glycated albumin levels. Serum albumin is exclusively produced by the liver.[1]and fasting glucose levels primarily reflect hepatic glucose output.[1]Genetic factors influencing liver function and glucose regulation, therefore, can significantly impact glycated albumin. For instance, theGCKR(glucokinase regulatory protein) gene, predominantly expressed in the liver rather than the pancreas, plays a role in hepatic glucose metabolism.[1] A missense mutation in GCKR, specifically rs1260326 , has been significantly associated with lower levels of percent glycated albumin.[1] This variant’s effect on glycated albumin, but not necessarily on HbA1c, highlights the importance of liver-specific genetic factors given that albumin is a liver product, while red blood cells (which carry HbA1c) are not directly affected by hepatic function.[1] Furthermore, variants in GCKRare also linked to other metabolic and inflammatory conditions, including kidney disease, triglyceride levels, and Crohn disease, underscoring its broader involvement in systemic homeostasis.[1]

Genetic Influences on Glycated Albumin Levels

Section titled “Genetic Influences on Glycated Albumin Levels”

Genetic mechanisms contribute to the variability in percent glycated albumin through both glycemic and non-glycemic pathways. BeyondGCKR, other genetic variants have been identified. For example, rs34459162 , located in the RCN3(reticulocalbin 3) gene, has been associated with fructosamine and total glycated albumin.[1] RCN3encodes an EF-hand calcium binding domain, and related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have shown associations with total protein and serum albumin concentrations, suggesting an impact on glycated albumin potentially through its influence on albumin levels rather than direct glucose metabolism.[1] Other variants, such as rs2438321 (intergenic, near CNTN5) and rs59443763 (intronic in PRKCA), have also been associated with percent glycated albumin, particularly in specific ancestral groups.[1]The genetic landscape of percent glycated albumin differs from that of HbA1c; manyHbA1cvariants are associated with erythrocyte and hemoglobin factors, which do not typically influence fructosamine or glycated albumin.[1]Studies indicate that genetic factors related to fasting glucose and serum albumin both contribute to the variance observed in percent glycated albumin, reflecting the dual influence of glucose exposure and the concentration of the albumin itself.[1]

Pathophysiological Implications and Systemic Health

Section titled “Pathophysiological Implications and Systemic Health”

Percent glycated albumin serves as an important indicator of metabolic health, with its levels closely tied to the risk and complications of diabetes.[1]Beyond its role as a glycemic marker, the overall concentration of serum albumin itself carries significant pathophysiological implications. Low plasma albumin concentrations are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality.[6]Various conditions, including cancer, liver and kidney diseases, and acute and chronic inflammatory states, can lead to reduced plasma albumin levels.[6]Consequently, while percent glycated albumin specifically assesses the degree of glycation relative to total albumin, the absolute level of albumin and its genetic determinants also play a role in overall health and disease susceptibility. The ability of percent glycated albumin to distinguish genetic factors specific to serum protein concentration versus hyperglycemia makes it a valuable tool for dissecting the complex interplay between glucose metabolism, protein homeostasis, and systemic disease processes.[1]

The level of percent glycated albumin is fundamentally influenced by the metabolic pathways governing glucose and albumin concentrations in the body. Albumin, the most abundant serum protein, is primarily synthesized in the liver.[6]Therefore, genetic factors affecting hepatic glucose output or albumin production directly impact the availability of albumin for glycation and the glucose concentration it is exposed to. For instance, theGCKR(glucokinase regulatory protein) gene, predominantly expressed in the liver, plays a crucial role in regulating hepatic glucose metabolism.[1] Variants in GCKRinfluence fasting glucose levels, a measure of hepatic glucose output, thereby affecting the glycemic environment to which albumin is exposed and consequently its glycation status.[1]

Genetic and Regulatory Influences on Albumin Glycation

Section titled “Genetic and Regulatory Influences on Albumin Glycation”

Genetic variations contribute significantly to the regulation of percent glycated albumin by modulating either glucose levels or albumin synthesis and turnover. A missense mutation inGCKR, specifically rs1260326 , has been significantly associated with lower levels of percent glycated albumin.[1]This variant’s influence on hepatic glucose metabolism, rather than pancreatic function, directly impacts the substrate (glucose) for albumin glycation, illustrating a key regulatory mechanism. Furthermore, variants in genes likeRCN3 (encoding reticulocalbin 3), such as rs34459162 , have been linked to total glycated albumin and fructosamine.[1] While not directly associated with serum albumin in some analyses, other studies indicate that rs34459162 or variants in perfect linkage disequilibrium can affect total protein and serum albumin levels, suggesting potential nonglycemic pathways influencing glycated albumin through its protein component.[1]

Post-Translational Glycation and Protein Dynamics

Section titled “Post-Translational Glycation and Protein Dynamics”

The formation of glycated albumin is a non-enzymatic post-translational modification process where glucose slowly attaches to N-terminal valine and internal lysine amino groups of the albumin protein.[7]This process, known as non-enzymatic glycosylation or glycation, is directly proportional to the concentration of glucose to which the albumin is exposed over its lifespan.[7]Unlike glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), which reflects glucose exposure over 2-3 months due to the erythrocyte lifespan, percent glycated albumin captures glycemic control over a shorter period of 2-4 weeks, reflecting the typical turnover rate of albumin.[1]The calculation of percent glycated albumin also accounts for serum albumin concentration, highlighting that both glucose levels and the quantity of the protein itself are critical determinants of this biomarker.[1]

Systemic Integration and Clinical Significance

Section titled “Systemic Integration and Clinical Significance”

Percent glycated albumin serves as a valuable biomarker that integrates multiple physiological pathways related to glucose and protein metabolism, offering insights into systemic glycemic status. Its levels are influenced by factors such as liver function (for albumin production) and overall glucose homeostasis.[1]Dysregulation in these pathways, such as sustained hyperglycemia, leads to increased glycated albumin, which is itself associated with an increased risk of diabetes complications. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs), formed through this glycation process, are implicated in the progression of diabetic complications, including kidney disease, where albumin and AGEs can regulate heparanase in proximal tubular cells.[8], [9]Understanding these integrated pathways and their dysregulation provides potential therapeutic targets and improves the diagnostic and prognostic utility of percent glycated albumin in clinical management.

Complementary Glycemic Monitoring and Diagnostic Utility

Section titled “Complementary Glycemic Monitoring and Diagnostic Utility”

Percent glycated albuminserves as an additional biomarker for hyperglycemia, offering insights into glycemic control over a shorter timeframe, typically reflecting glucose exposure over the preceding 2-4 weeks, in contrast toHbA1c which reflects a 2-3 month period.[1] This shorter window makes percent glycated albuminparticularly valuable for monitoring rapid changes in glycemic status, such as evaluating the immediate effectiveness of new dietary interventions, medication adjustments, or in situations requiring more frequent assessment of glucose control.[1] While HbA1c remains the standard for diabetes diagnosis and long-term monitoring, percent glycated albumin can complement its use, providing a more dynamic view of recent glycemic fluctuations.[1] Studies indicate that percent glycated albumin demonstrates associations with diabetes risk and complications similar to those observed with HbA1c, suggesting its potential utility beyond just monitoring.[1] Its application as a diagnostic aid is gaining interest, particularly in populations where HbA1cmeasurements may be unreliable due to factors affecting red blood cell lifespan or hemoglobin structure.[1] By offering a distinct yet related measure of hyperglycemia, percent glycated albumin contributes to a more comprehensive approach to identifying and managing glycemic dysregulation, potentially aiding in earlier detection or refined risk assessment.[1]

The established associations between percent glycated albumin levels and both diabetes risk and its complications underscore its prognostic utility.[1] Elevated percent glycated albuminlevels can serve as an indicator for predicting disease progression and long-term outcomes in individuals with, or at risk for, diabetes.[1] Understanding these associations can assist healthcare providers in anticipating potential health trajectories, informing patient education on the importance of glycemic control, and guiding decisions regarding the intensity of therapeutic interventions.[1] Percent glycated albumin can also contribute significantly to risk stratification, particularly in individuals without a formal diabetes diagnosis.[1] By reflecting recent glycemic exposure, it offers a distinct perspective that can help identify individuals at higher risk for developing diabetes or its complications, even when HbA1c levels might not yet indicate a clear diagnosis.[1] Integrating percent glycated albumin into broader risk assessment models facilitates more personalized medicine approaches, enabling targeted prevention strategies and earlier, more precise interventions for those most vulnerable to adverse glycemic outcomes.[1] Genetic variants, such as rs1260326 in GCKR, found to be associated with percent glycated albumin levels, may further refine these personalized risk assessments.[1]

Impact of Genetic and Non-Glycemic Factors

Section titled “Impact of Genetic and Non-Glycemic Factors”

A significant clinical advantage of percent glycated albumin is its independence from factors that can confound HbA1cresults, such as red blood cell turnover rate, hemoglobinopathies, and anemia.[1] This makes percent glycated albumina more reliable marker in patient populations with conditions affecting erythrocyte lifespan or hemoglobin structure, whereHbA1c values may not accurately reflect glycemic status.[1] For instance, genetic variants affecting erythrocyte traits significantly influence HbA1c but do not similarly impact percent glycated albumin, which is related to serum proteins, thus offering an alternative in such challenging clinical scenarios.[1] Genetic studies have identified specific variants influencing percent glycated albumin levels, such as rs1260326 in GCKR and rs59443763 in PRKCA.[1] These genetic insights highlight that individual genetic backgrounds can affect percent glycated albumin levels, sometimes through pathways distinct from those influencing HbA1cor fasting glucose.[1] This understanding is crucial for interpreting percent glycated albumin in the context of personalized medicine, especially as some variants may impact glycated albumin through nonglycemic pathways, such as those affecting serum albumin levels, necessitating careful consideration of a patient’s genetic profile for accurate clinical interpretation.[1]

RS IDGeneRelated Traits
rs59443763 PRKCApercent glycated albumin
total glycated albumin
rs1260326 GCKRurate measurement
total blood protein measurement
serum albumin amount
coronary artery calcification
lipid measurement

Frequently Asked Questions About Percent Glycated Albumin

Section titled “Frequently Asked Questions About Percent Glycated Albumin”

These questions address the most important and specific aspects of percent glycated albumin based on current genetic research.


1. Why do my short-term blood sugar levels seem high even if I’m trying to be careful?

Section titled “1. Why do my short-term blood sugar levels seem high even if I’m trying to be careful?”

Your short-term blood sugar levels, measured by glycated albumin, can be influenced by your unique genetic makeup. Even with careful lifestyle choices, specific genetic variants, like one in theGCKRgene, can affect how your body processes glucose or produces albumin, potentially leading to different levels for you compared to others. This means genetics can play a role in how efficiently your body manages glucose exposure over a few weeks.

2. Does my liver play a role in how my blood sugar is measured?

Section titled “2. Does my liver play a role in how my blood sugar is measured?”

Yes, your liver is very important for this particular blood sugar measurement. The protein measured, albumin, is primarily produced in your liver. Genetic factors affecting your liver, such as variations in the GCKRgene which is highly expressed there, can influence your glycated albumin levels and how your body processes glucose.

3. If I have anemia, is my usual blood sugar test still accurate for me?

Section titled “3. If I have anemia, is my usual blood sugar test still accurate for me?”

If you have conditions like anemia or kidney disease, your usual HbA1c test might not be accurate. These conditions can affect your red blood cells, making HbA1c falsely high or low. In such cases, a glycated albumin test can be a more reliable way to assess your average blood sugar over the preceding few weeks, offering a clearer picture.

4. My doctor mentioned a different blood sugar test used in other countries. Why?

Section titled “4. My doctor mentioned a different blood sugar test used in other countries. Why?”

Your doctor might be referring to glycated albumin, which is widely adopted in places like Japan as a standard way to monitor blood sugar. It offers a shorter-term view of your glucose control (2-4 weeks) compared to the more common HbA1c test, making it a valuable complementary tool for assessing diabetes risk and managing fluctuations.

5. Could my family background affect how my blood sugar levels are tracked?

Section titled “5. Could my family background affect how my blood sugar levels are tracked?”

Yes, your family background and ancestry can significantly influence your genetic risk for diabetes and how blood sugar markers behave. Genetic factors, including allele frequencies, can vary across different populations. This means findings from one ancestral group might not fully apply to yours, highlighting the need for diverse research to understand your specific risks.

6. Why might my short-term blood sugar marker be different from my long-term one?

Section titled “6. Why might my short-term blood sugar marker be different from my long-term one?”

Your short-term blood sugar marker (glycated albumin) and your long-term one (HbA1c) reflect different timeframes. Glycated albumin shows your average glucose over the past 2-4 weeks, while HbA1c reflects 2-3 months. This difference allows them to capture distinct aspects of your glycemic control, with one showing recent changes and the other a broader trend.

7. Can my genes make it harder for me to keep my blood sugar low?

Section titled “7. Can my genes make it harder for me to keep my blood sugar low?”

Yes, your genes can definitely make it harder. Specific genetic variants have been linked to higher levels of glycated albumin, indicating that some people have a genetic predisposition that influences their blood sugar control. For example, variants like rs1260326 in the GCKR gene have been associated with lower levels, suggesting other variants could contribute to higher levels.

8. Is there a genetic reason why my blood sugar control might be unique?

Section titled “8. Is there a genetic reason why my blood sugar control might be unique?”

Absolutely. Everyone’s genetic makeup is unique, and this extends to how your body metabolizes glucose and produces proteins like albumin. Genetic variants, such as those in genes likeGCKR, RCN3, or PRKCA, can influence your glycated albumin levels, making your individual blood sugar response distinct from others.

9. If my regular diabetes test is confusing, is there another option for me?

Section titled “9. If my regular diabetes test is confusing, is there another option for me?”

Yes, if your regular HbA1c test is giving confusing results, especially due to conditions affecting your red blood cells, glycated albumin can be a valuable alternative. It provides a reliable measure of your average blood glucose over a shorter period (2-4 weeks) and is not affected by factors that interfere with HbA1c.

10. Does my ancestry mean I need different insights into my diabetes risk?

Section titled “10. Does my ancestry mean I need different insights into my diabetes risk?”

Yes, your ancestry can be very important for understanding your diabetes risk. Genetic risk factors and their impact on blood sugar markers like glycated albumin can vary significantly across different ancestral populations. Research often shows population-specific genetic findings, meaning a personalized approach based on your background can provide more accurate insights.


This FAQ was automatically generated based on current genetic research and may be updated as new information becomes available.

Disclaimer: This information is for educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a healthcare provider for personalized medical guidance.

[1] Loomis, S. J., et al. “Genome-Wide Association Study of Serum Fructosamine and Glycated Albumin in Adults Without Diagnosed Diabetes: Results from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.”Diabetes, vol. 67, Aug. 2018, pp. 1684–1696. PMID: 29844224.

[2] Koga, Masaaki, and Shinichi Kasayama. “Clinical impact of glycated albumin as another glycemic control marker.” Endocrine Journal, vol. 57, no. 9, 2010, pp. 751–762.

[3] Parrinello, Corinne M., and Elizabeth Selvin. “Beyond HbA1c and glucose: the role of nontraditional glycemic markers in diabetes diagnosis, prognosis, and management.”Current Diabetes Reports, vol. 14, no. 9, 2014, p. 548.

[4] Cohen, Ronald M., and David B. Sacks. “Comparing multiple measures of glycemia: how to transition from biomarker to diagnostic test?” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 12, 2012, pp. 1615–1617.

[5] Rubinow, Kyle B., and Irl B. Hirsch. “Reexamining metrics for glucose control.”JAMA, vol. 305, no. 11, 2011, pp. 1132–1133.

[6] Franceschini, N., et al. “Discovery and fine mapping of serum protein loci through transethnic meta-analysis.” Am J Hum Genet, vol. 93, no. 6, 2013, pp. 1015-1025.

[7] Pare, G., et al. “Novel association of HK1 with glycated hemoglobin in a non-diabetic population: a genome-wide evaluation of 14,618 participants in the Women’s Genome Health Study.”PLoS Genet, vol. 4, no. 12, 2008, e1000312.

[8] Singh, V. P., et al. “Advanced glycation end products and diabetic complications.” Journal of Diabetes Research, 2014, Article ID 760484.

[9] Masola, V., et al. “Regulation of heparanase by albumin and advanced glycation end products in proximal tubular cells.” Biochim Biophys Acta, vol. 1813, no. 8, 2011, pp. 1475-1482.