Skip to content

Hair Morphology

Hair morphology refers to the observable characteristics of human hair, encompassing its shape (e.g., straight, wavy, curly, coiled), thickness, and overall texture. This highly variable trait is a prominent aspect of human diversity, with distinct forms observed across individuals and populations globally. The investigation into hair morphology has a long history, with early studies exploring its patterns of inheritance.[1]

The physical attributes of hair are primarily determined by the structure of the hair follicle, the specialized skin organ responsible for hair production. The cross-sectional shape of the hair follicle dictates the degree of curl in the hair shaft.[2] For example, a follicle with a round cross-section typically produces straight hair, whereas an oval or flattened cross-section leads to wavy, curly, or coiled hair. Research indicates that human hair shape is programmed from the hair bulb.[3] Genetic factors are fundamental in shaping these morphological traits. Early family studies proposed that straight hair might be a recessive trait compared to curly hair.[1]More recent genomic studies have identified specific genes and genetic variants linked to various aspects of hair morphology. For instance, theEDAR gene has been found to be associated with hair thickness, particularly among Asian populations.[4] Other genes, such as WNT10A and OFCC1, have been connected to hair curl, with specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) likers7349332 (in WNT10A) and rs1556547 (near OFCC1) showing associations with hair curl and straightness, respectively.[2] The protein trichohyalin, encoded by the TCHH gene, also plays a critical role by mechanically strengthening the hair follicle, particularly within the inner root sheath layer.[5]

While variations in hair morphology are generally part of normal human diversity, certain unusual hair characteristics can sometimes signal underlying health conditions. Abnormalities in hair texture, fragility, or growth patterns may indicate genetic disorders, nutritional deficiencies, or hormonal imbalances. For example, mutations in theWNT10A gene can be associated with autosomal recessive ectodermal dysplasias, conditions that affect the development of hair, teeth, and nails.[6]

Hair morphology carries significant social and cultural weight. Throughout history and across diverse cultures, hair has served as a powerful symbol of personal identity, beauty standards, social status, and cultural affiliation. Individual preferences and societal norms often influence people to adopt various styling practices to alter their natural hair morphology. A deeper genetic understanding of hair traits contributes to advancements in forensic science, dermatological research, and the development of personalized cosmetic solutions.

Methodological and Statistical Constraints

Section titled “Methodological and Statistical Constraints”

Sample size is a critical factor in genetic association studies, where even large cohorts (e.g., n=18,096.[7] N=3025.[8]can lead to statistically significant findings for variants with modest effect sizes, potentially overstating their biological relevance to hair morphology. Furthermore, initial discovery phases in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are susceptible to effect-size inflation, necessitating rigorous replication in independent cohorts to validate findings and ensure the reliability of reported associations.[7]Consistent replication across diverse populations is crucial, as discrepancies in effect size estimates between discovery and replication cohorts can highlight the need for more robust validation strategies.

The statistical methodologies employed also introduce limitations; for instance, generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) used in GWAS can bias absolute heritability quantification, although relative quantification remains robust.[9] The extensive number of genetic markers tested in GWAS creates a substantial multiple testing burden, requiring stringent statistical thresholds that might obscure genuine associations, especially those with sex-specific effects if not specifically investigated.[10]Additionally, current GWAS approaches might miss relevant genes due to incomplete SNP coverage, thereby providing an incomplete picture of the genetic landscape underlying hair morphology.[10]

The term “hair morphology” encompasses a wide array of characteristics, including curl pattern, thickness, color, and density, each of which may have distinct genetic underpinnings. The precision and consistency with which these diverse phenotypic traits are defined and measured across studies present a significant challenge. Subjective assessments or variations in quantitative techniques can introduce considerable noise and variability, potentially diluting the power to detect true genetic associations and complicating meta-analyses.

While advanced imaging and analytical tools improve phenotypic characterization, standardization remains an ongoing effort. Inaccurate or inconsistent phenotyping directly impacts the reliability of genetic associations, as even robust statistical methods cannot fully compensate for poor quality input data. Therefore, the ability to generalize findings regarding specific genetic variants to different aspects of hair morphology or across studies is heavily reliant on the uniformity and accuracy of phenotypic data collection.

Population Specificity and Unexplained Variance

Section titled “Population Specificity and Unexplained Variance”

A significant limitation in genetic studies of hair morphology, as with many complex traits, is the potential for ascertainment and cohort bias, often leading to a predominance of participants from specific ancestral backgrounds. Genetic associations identified primarily in populations of European or Japanese descent.[9] may not be directly transferable or generalizable to individuals of other ancestries due to differences in allele frequencies, linkage disequilibrium patterns, and genetic architecture.[8] The presence of population admixture further complicates analyses, requiring sophisticated statistical corrections to prevent spurious associations.[10]Hair morphology is profoundly influenced by a complex interplay of genetic factors, environmental exposures, and gene-environment interactions. Factors such as diet, climate, hair care practices, and chemical treatments can significantly modify hair characteristics, acting as confounders that are often not fully captured or accounted for in genetic studies. Despite the identification of numerous genetic loci, a substantial portion of the heritability for hair morphology remains unexplained, a phenomenon termed “missing heritability.” This suggests that many genetic variants with small effects, rare variants, structural variations, epigenetic modifications, or complex epistatic interactions are yet to be discovered, leaving considerable gaps in our understanding of the complete genetic landscape of hair morphology.

Genetic variations play a significant role in determining the diverse characteristics of human hair, influencing traits such as texture, thickness, and overall morphology. The TCHHL1 and TCHH genes, for instance, are central to the structural integrity and appearance of hair. TCHH, or Trichohyalin, is a key component of the inner root sheath of hair follicles and the medulla of the hair shaft, providing mechanical strength and rigidity to the hair fiber.[11] A variant like rs11803731 within TCHHcan alter the protein’s structure or expression, leading to differences in hair texture, curliness, or strength. Similarly,TCHHL1, a Trichohyalin-like 1 gene, contributes to the keratin-associated proteins that encapsulate the hair fiber, and its associated variant rs17646946 may impact the overall robustness and appearance of hair. These genes are crucial for the proper formation and maintenance of hair, with variations affecting how hair grows and feels.[12] Other crucial genes involved in hair development include EDAR and WNT10A, which are part of signaling pathways essential for the formation of hair follicles and other ectodermal appendages. The EDAR gene, or Ectodysplasin A Receptor, is a key regulator in the Ectodysplasin pathway, which is fundamental for the development of hair, teeth, and sweat glands. A common variant, rs3827760 , in EDAR is strongly associated with hair thickness and straightness, with certain alleles being linked to thicker, straighter hair types observed in various populations.[11] Meanwhile, WNT10A (Wnt Family Member 10A) is involved in the Wnt signaling pathway, which controls cell proliferation and differentiation during embryonic development, including hair follicle morphogenesis. The variant rs7349332 in WNT10A can influence hair follicle density and structure, potentially leading to differences in hair growth patterns or even contributing to conditions like hypotrichosis, where hair growth is sparse.[12] Beyond structural proteins and developmental pathways, other genetic regions contribute to the nuanced traits of hair. The variant rs499697 , located between CRCT1 and LCE3E, highlights the involvement of the epidermal differentiation complex in hair characteristics. LCE3E (Late Cornified Envelope 3E) is part of a gene cluster that produces proteins important for the skin barrier and hair shaft formation, suggesting that variations here could affect hair strength, elasticity, or susceptibility to environmental damage.[11] Additionally, the region containing THEM4 and KRT8P28 includes rs10788819 . While THEM4 is involved in mitochondrial metabolism, KRT8P28 is a pseudogene related to keratins, the primary structural proteins of hair. Variations in or near keratin-related genes can subtly alter hair texture, resilience, and resistance to breakage.[12] Less direct but still potentially influential are variants such as rs1268789 in FRAS1 and rs6732426 in THADA. FRAS1 (Fraser Syndrome 1) is involved in maintaining basement membrane integrity, a critical structure for skin and hair follicle adhesion. While severe mutations cause Fraser syndrome with broad developmental anomalies, common variants might have subtler effects on hair follicle stability or shape.[11] The THADA gene, associated with rs6732426 , is linked to thyroid function and metabolic processes, which can indirectly impact hair quality and growth cycles through hormonal regulation. Finally, non-coding RNA regions, such as those associated withrs7586898 (near LINC01804 and RNU5E-7P) and rs12623288 (within LINC01820), represent regulatory elements that may influence the expression of nearby genes critical for hair follicle biology, thereby contributing to the complex polygenic inheritance of hair morphology.[12]

RS IDGeneRelated Traits
rs17646946 TCHHL1 - TCHHhair morphology
rs11803731 TCHHhair morphology
balding
strand of hair shape
coat/hair morphology trait
rs3827760 EDARchin morphology trait, lip morphology trait
outer ear morphology trait
lobe size
lobe attachment
helix rolling
rs7349332 WNT10Ahair morphology
balding
androgenetic alopecia
alopecia
lipid
rs499697 CRCT1 - LCE3Ehair morphology
rs10788819 THEM4 - KRT8P28hair morphology
cis-4-decenoate (10:1n6)
rs1268789 FRAS1hair morphology
strand of hair shape
hair color
rs6732426 THADAhair morphology
alopecia
rs7586898 LINC01804 - RNU5E-7Phair morphology
rs12623288 LINC01820hair morphology

Frequently Asked Questions About Hair Morphology

Section titled “Frequently Asked Questions About Hair Morphology”

These questions address the most important and specific aspects of hair morphology based on current genetic research.


1. Why is my hair straight when my sibling has really curly hair?

Section titled “1. Why is my hair straight when my sibling has really curly hair?”

Your hair shape is primarily determined by your hair follicles, which are set by your genetics. While some genes like WNT10A are linked to hair curl, different combinations of genetic variants from your parents can lead to distinct hair types even among siblings. Early studies suggested that straight hair might even be a recessive trait compared to curly hair.

2. Can I ever permanently change my curly hair to straight?

Section titled “2. Can I ever permanently change my curly hair to straight?”

The fundamental shape of your hair, whether straight or curly, is programmed from the hair bulb itself, deep within your skin. This shape is dictated by the cross-sectional shape of your hair follicle. While styling practices can temporarily alter your hair’s appearance, they don’t change the underlying biological structure that produces your natural hair morphology.

3. My hair feels really fragile; could that be a health issue?

Section titled “3. My hair feels really fragile; could that be a health issue?”

Yes, unusual hair characteristics like extreme fragility or changes in texture can sometimes signal underlying health conditions. These might include genetic disorders, nutritional deficiencies, or hormonal imbalances. For example, the protein trichohyalin, encoded by the TCHH gene, is crucial for mechanically strengthening your hair, and issues here could contribute to fragility.

4. Does my Asian background affect how thick my hair is?

Section titled “4. Does my Asian background affect how thick my hair is?”

Yes, your ancestral background can play a role in hair characteristics. For instance, research has found that the EDAR gene is significantly associated with hair thickness, particularly among Asian populations. This means certain genetic variants common in your heritage might influence your hair’s natural thickness.

5. Will my kids definitely inherit my exact hair type?

Section titled “5. Will my kids definitely inherit my exact hair type?”

Not necessarily your exacthair type, but genetic factors are fundamental in shaping hair morphology. Your children will inherit a combination of genes from both you and your partner. While specific genes likeWNT10A and OFCC1 are linked to hair curl, the complex interplay of these genes means your children might have a different hair shape or thickness than you.

6. Can eating certain foods make my hair thicker?

Section titled “6. Can eating certain foods make my hair thicker?”

Hair thickness is primarily determined by genetic factors, such as the EDAR gene, which influences the hair follicle’s structure. While good nutrition is essential for overall hair health and growth, there’s no direct evidence that specific foods can fundamentally alter your genetically programmed hair thickness. However, nutritional deficiencies can lead to hair abnormalities.

7. Is a DNA test useful for understanding my hair type?

Section titled “7. Is a DNA test useful for understanding my hair type?”

A DNA test could provide insights into some of the genetic variants associated with your hair morphology, like those linked to curl (WNT10A, OFCC1) or thickness (EDAR). This information can reveal your genetic predispositions. However, hair morphology is a complex trait influenced by many genes, and current tests might not capture the full picture.

8. Why do some of my friends have extremely curly hair, but mine is just wavy?

Section titled “8. Why do some of my friends have extremely curly hair, but mine is just wavy?”

The degree of curl in your hair is dictated by the cross-sectional shape of your hair follicles. A round follicle tends to produce straight hair, while oval or flattened shapes lead to wavy, curly, or coiled hair. These follicle shapes are genetically programmed, meaning variations in genes like WNT10A and OFCC1 can lead to different curl patterns among individuals.

9. If I damage my hair a lot, can it permanently change its curl pattern?

Section titled “9. If I damage my hair a lot, can it permanently change its curl pattern?”

While severe damage can certainly affect the texture and health of your existing hair shaft, the fundamental human hair shape is programmed from the hair bulb. This means the new hair growing from the follicle will retain its genetically determined curl pattern, even if the previously grown hair was damaged.

10. Does my natural hair morphology limit how I can style my hair?

Section titled “10. Does my natural hair morphology limit how I can style my hair?”

Your natural hair morphology, determined by your hair follicles and genes, provides the fundamental characteristics of your hair. While you can use various styling practices to temporarily alter its appearance, these don’t change the underlying structure. Understanding your hair’s natural curl or thickness can help you choose styles that work best with its inherent properties.


This FAQ was automatically generated based on current genetic research and may be updated as new information becomes available.

Disclaimer: This information is for educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a healthcare provider for personalized medical guidance.

[1] Davenport, G., and C. Davenport. “Heredity of Hair-Form in Man.” Am Nat, vol. 42, 1908.

[2] Eriksson, N., et al. “Web-Based, Participant-Driven Studies Yield Novel Genetic Associations for Common Traits.” PLoS Genet, 2010.

[3] Thibaut, S., et al. “Human Hair Shape Is Programmed from the Bulb.” Br J Dermatol, vol. 152, 2005, pp. 632–38.

[4] Fujimoto, A., et al. “A Scan for Genetic Determinants of Human Hair Morphology:EDAR Is Associated with Asian Hair Thickness.” Hum Mol Genet, vol. 17, 2008, pp. 835–43.

[5] Lee, S., et al. “The Structure of Human Trichohyalin. Potential Multiple Roles as a Functional EF-Hand-Like Calcium-Binding Protein, a Cornified Cell Envelope Precursor, and an Intermediate Filament-Associated (Cross-Linking) Protein.” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 268, 1993, pp. 12164–12176.

[6] Adaimy, L., et al. “Mutation in WNT10A Is Associated with an Autosomal Recessive Ectodermal Dysplasia: The Odonto-Onycho-Dermal Dysplasia.” Am J Hum Genet, vol. 81, 2007, pp. 821–28.

[7] Meyer, H. V., et al. “Genetic and functional insights into the fractal structure of the heart.” Nature, vol. 585, no. 7824, 2020, pp. 259–264.

[8] Weedon, Michael N., et al. “Genome-wide association analysis identifies 20 loci that influence adult height.” Nature Genetics, vol. 40, no. 5, 2008, pp. 575–583.

[9] Ishigaki, Kenichi, et al. “Large-scale genome-wide association study in a Japanese population identifies novel susceptibility loci across different diseases.” Nature Genetics, vol. 52, no. 3, 2020, pp. 325–334.

[10] Yang, Qiong, et al. “Genome-wide association and linkage analyses of hemostatic factors and hematological phenotypes in the Framingham Heart Study.”BMC Medical Genetics, vol. 8, no. 1, 2007, p. 57.

[11] Jiang, Y. “Propensity Score-Based Nonparametric Test Revealing Genetic Variants Underlying Bipolar Disorder.” Genet Epidemiol, vol. 35, no. 2, 2011, pp. 100-106.

[12] Wilk, J. B., et al. “Framingham Heart Study Genome-Wide Association: Results for Pulmonary Function Measures.” BMC Med Genet, vol. 8, suppl. 1, 2007, p. S8.