Skip to content

Eosinophil Count

Eosinophil count refers to the number of eosinophils, a specific type of white blood cell, present in a given volume of blood. These cells are a crucial component of the immune system, primarily recognized for their role in allergic reactions, asthma, and defense against parasitic infections. As part of a routine complete blood count (CBC), the eosinophil count provides valuable insights into an individual’s immune status and potential underlying health conditions.

Eosinophils are granulocytes, a category of white blood cells characterized by granules in their cytoplasm. They originate from hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow and their development and function are tightly regulated by various genetic and environmental factors. Genetic studies, particularly Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS), have revealed specific genomic regions and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that influence eosinophil numbers.

For instance, the GATA2gene locus has been consistently associated with eosinophil counts.[1] GATA2is a well-known zinc-finger transcription factor that plays an essential role in hematopoiesis, particularly in the regulation of basophil and eosinophil development.[1] A landmark SNP within this locus, rs4328821 , has been shown to be significantly associated with both basophil and eosinophil counts, with the A allele increasing the counts of both cell types.[1] This pleiotropic association highlights a shared genetic basis for the regulation of these two granulocyte subtypes, which also exhibit a moderate correlation in their counts.[1]Other genetic loci identified as influencing eosinophil counts include theHBS1L-MYB locus and the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) region.[1] The RIN3locus has also been associated with eosinophil counts.[2]These genetic associations suggest complex regulatory pathways governing eosinophil production and maturation.

The eosinophil count is a significant diagnostic marker. Elevated eosinophil counts, a condition known as eosinophilia, can be indicative of various health issues, including allergic diseases such as asthma, hay fever, and eczema, as well as parasitic infections.[2]Research has also linked sequence variants affecting eosinophil numbers to asthma and myocardial infarction.[3]Conversely, abnormally low eosinophil counts (eosinopenia) are less common but can occur in response to stress, certain acute infections, or specific drug treatments. Monitoring eosinophil levels helps clinicians diagnose and manage these conditions, guiding therapeutic interventions.

Understanding the genetic underpinnings of eosinophil count has broad social implications. Given their involvement in common conditions like asthma and allergies, genetic insights can contribute to personalized medicine approaches, potentially identifying individuals at higher risk for these diseases or predicting their response to specific treatments. The identification of genetic loci influencing eosinophil counts, such as those in theGATA2and MHC regions, enhances our understanding of immune system regulation and disease susceptibility. This knowledge can ultimately lead to improved diagnostic tools, targeted therapies, and better public health strategies for managing immune-related disorders.

Methodological and Statistical Constraints

Section titled “Methodological and Statistical Constraints”

Studies on eosinophil counts and related allergic traits face several methodological and statistical limitations that can impact the interpretation of genetic associations. A common challenge is the variability insample size, particularly when analyzing specific cell subtypes or stratifying populations. For instance, some analyses for eosinophil count have shown decreased sample sizes compared to initial reports, which can lead to a lack ofgenome-wide significance for certain regions or limit the statistical power to detect smaller genetic effects.[4] Furthermore, the handling of genomic inflation in meta-analyses can influence results; while some studies meticulously control for it, others might not apply corrections, potentially affecting the reliability of reported P-values.[5]Beyond sample size, specificstudy design choices can introduce constraints. Variations in follow-up time within cohorts may influence association results, and the assumption of a purely monogenic effect in some genome-wide association studies (GWAS) simplifies a potentially complex genetic architecture.[6]Additionally, when studying correlated phenotypes, such as asthma, hay fever, and eczema, the presence of shared cases and controls can introduce dependencies that require careful consideration, as traits are not always independent.[2] These design elements highlight the need for robust statistical methods and sufficiently powered cohorts to accurately identify and validate genetic associations.

Defining and measuring eosinophil counts and related allergic phenotypes presents inherent challenges that can affect genetic research. The characterization of complex traits like allergic rhinitis often relies onquestionnaire-based criteria, which, while commonly employed, can be a simplification of a nuanced biological condition.[7]This reductionist approach might not fully capture the spectrum of allergic conditions, such as eosinophilic esophagitis, or consider specific disease endophenotypes, potentially obscuring more precise genetic influences.[6] Furthermore, the biological sample source for can significantly impact findings. Gene expression profiles, for example, may differ based on the chosen tissue, such as peripheral blood CD4+ lymphocytes, potentially yielding distinct results compared to other tissues.[7]Eosinophil counts also exhibitcorrelationswith other white blood cell subtypes, like basophil counts, and certain genetic loci, such as theGATA2 region, can show pleiotropic effects influencing multiple related cell lineages.[4]These complexities mean that identified genetic variants often explain only a small proportion of the overall variation in eosinophil counts, pointing to substantialmissing heritability and the need for more comprehensive phenotypic characterization.

Generalizability and Environmental Confounders

Section titled “Generalizability and Environmental Confounders”

The generalizabilityof findings regarding eosinophil counts is frequently limited by the ancestral composition of study populations. Many genetic studies have historically focused on populations of European or specific Asian ancestries, such as Japanese cohorts, leading to potentialancestry-specific findings that may not directly translate to other ethnic groups.[7]While some loci show associations across different ancestral populations, gene expression and genetic effects can vary by ethnicity, necessitating more diverse cohorts to fully understand the global genetic architecture of eosinophil regulation.[7] Moreover, environmental factors and their interplay with genetic predispositions represent significant confoundersthat are often difficult to fully account for. Factors such as the season in which a blood sample is drawn, the use of systemic corticosteroids, or exposure to tobacco smoke can substantially influence eosinophil levels but are not always available for inclusion in genetic models.[8] Although some studies strive to control for environmental similarities within a cohort, this can inadvertently limit the generalizability of environmental influences to broader, more diverse populations.[2] These unmeasured environmental or gene-environment interactionscontribute to the unexplained variance and the challenge of establishing definitive causal relationships between identified genetic variants and eosinophil counts.

Genetic variations play a crucial role in influencing an individual’s eosinophil count, a key biomarker in allergic diseases and immune responses. These variants often affect genes involved in immune cell development, signaling pathways, and inflammatory processes. The complex interplay of these genetic factors can lead to subtle or significant differences in the number of eosinophils circulating in the blood.

Variants in genes that govern fundamental cellular processes, such as protein modification and gene expression, can indirectly but significantly impact immune cell populations. For instance, RPN1 (Ribophorin I), a gene involved in N-linked glycosylation of proteins, is associated with variants like rs4857909 , rs6782812 , and rs13089722 . These variations could subtly alter the glycosylation patterns of immune-related proteins, potentially affecting their function or stability on the surface of eosinophils or other immune cells, thereby influencing their behavior and overall count.[9] Similarly, RANBP6 (RAN Binding Protein 6) and GTF3AP1 (General Transcription Factor IIIA-Interacting Protein 1) are involved in nuclear transport and transcription regulation, respectively. Variants such as rs2095044 , rs2381416 , and rs76962799 in these genes may lead to minor alterations in these fundamental cellular mechanisms, broadly affecting cellular homeostasis and immune cell development. Long intergenic non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) like LINC01565 and LINC02356, with variants including rs10774624 and rs111338191 , are known to regulate gene expression through various epigenetic and transcriptional mechanisms. While their precise roles are still being explored, these lncRNAs can modulate the expression of genes critical for immune cell differentiation or inflammatory pathways, thereby indirectly influencing eosinophil levels.[10] Other variants directly affect genes central to immune cell signaling and trafficking. The SH2B3 (SH2B Adaptor Protein 3) gene, which includes variants such as rs3184504 and rs7310615 , encodes an adaptor protein that negatively regulates cytokine signaling pathways, particularly important in hematopoietic stem cells. Variations inSH2B3can lead to altered cytokine responses, impacting the proliferation, differentiation, and survival of various immune cell types, including eosinophils, and are frequently linked to autoimmune conditions and blood cell traits.[1] ATXN2 (Ataxin 2), associated with rs3184504 , rs7137828 , rs653178 , and rs597808 , plays a role in RNA metabolism and stress granule formation, processes increasingly recognized for their involvement in immune regulation. Subtle changes mediated by these variants could impact the overall immune environment and indirectly affect eosinophil counts. Furthermore,ACKR1 (Atypical Chemokine Receptor 1), also known as the Duffy antigen, with variant rs2814778 , acts as a scavenger for a broad range of inflammatory chemokines, regulating their tissue and circulating levels. This scavenging activity is vital for controlling leukocyte migration, and variations in ACKR1 can alter the chemotactic gradients that guide eosinophils to sites of inflammation, thus influencing their peripheral blood counts. The antisense lncRNA CADM3-AS1, linked to rs7550207 , may modulate the expression of nearby cell adhesion molecules, which are crucial for immune cell trafficking and interactions.[11]Genes directly involved in inflammatory and allergic responses are particularly strong determinants of eosinophil biology.IL18R1 (Interleukin 18 Receptor 1), which includes variants rs9807989 , rs5833013 , rs67723747 , rs13019081 , rs10208293 , and rs12479210 , encodes a receptor for IL-18, a cytokine known to promote T helper 1 (Th1) responses and exacerbate allergic inflammation. Variants inIL18R1can modify the body’s response to IL-18, influencing the balance of inflammatory cytokines and potentially altering eosinophil recruitment and activation in allergic conditions.[8] Similarly, IL1RL1 (Interleukin 1 Receptor Like 1), a receptor for IL-33, is a major player in type 2 immune responses, which are critical in allergic diseases and eosinophilic disorders. Genetic variations in IL1RL1can modulate the sensitivity to IL-33, thereby impacting the intensity of allergic inflammation and directly affecting eosinophil proliferation and survival.IRF1 (Interferon Regulatory Factor 1), with variants like rs12515180 and rs2248116 , is a transcription factor vital for immune responses, particularly in mediating interferon signaling and regulating inflammatory gene expression. Dysregulation of IRF1 can shift the immune landscape, indirectly influencing the production and function of eosinophils. The adjacent lncRNA CARINH may exert regulatory effects on IRF1or other immune genes, contributing to the complex genetic architecture underlying eosinophil counts.[12]

RS IDGeneRelated Traits
rs4857909
rs6782812
rs13089722
LINC01565 - RPN1transcobalamin-1
eosinophil count
basophil
rs10774624
rs111338191
LINC02356rheumatoid arthritis
monokine induced by gamma interferon
C-X-C motif chemokine 10
Vitiligo
systolic blood pressure
rs3184504 ATXN2, SH2B3beta-2 microglobulin
hemoglobin
lung carcinoma, estrogen-receptor negative breast cancer, ovarian endometrioid carcinoma, colorectal cancer, prostate carcinoma, ovarian serous carcinoma, breast carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, squamous cell lung carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma
platelet crit
coronary artery disease
rs9807989
rs5833013
rs67723747
IL18R1asthma
eosinophil count
eosinophil percentage of leukocytes
interleukin-1 receptor type 2
seasonal allergic rhinitis
rs7137828
rs653178
rs597808
ATXN2open-angle glaucoma
diastolic blood pressure
systolic blood pressure
diastolic blood pressure, alcohol consumption quality
mean arterial pressure, alcohol drinking
rs2814778
rs7550207
ACKR1, CADM3-AS1neutrophil count
eosinophil count
granulocyte count
neutrophil count, basophil count
leukocyte quantity
rs2095044
rs2381416
rs76962799
RANBP6 - GTF3AP1eosinophil count
Antihistamine use
upper respiratory tract disorder
nasal disorder
chronic rhinosinusitis
rs7310615 SH2B3circulating fibrinogen levels
systolic blood pressure, alcohol consumption quality
systolic blood pressure, alcohol drinking
mean arterial pressure, alcohol drinking
mean arterial pressure, alcohol consumption quality
rs12515180
rs2248116
CARINH, IRF1eosinophil count
asthma, cardiovascular disease
eosinophil percentage of leukocytes
periostin
rs13019081
rs10208293
rs12479210
IL18R1, IL1RL1Glucocorticoid use
eosinophil count
neutrophil count

Genetic Predisposition and Regulatory Pathways

Section titled “Genetic Predisposition and Regulatory Pathways”

The eosinophil count is significantly influenced by inherited genetic variants, with numerous loci identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Key among these are variants in theGATA2 locus, notably rs4328821 , which has been consistently associated with eosinophil count in both European and Asian populations.[4] The GATA2 gene encodes a critical zinc-finger transcription factor essential for hematopoiesis, playing a pivotal role in the differentiation and regulation of early hematopoietic cell pools, including basophils and eosinophils.[4] For instance, individuals homozygous for the A allele of rs4328821 exhibit a 1.19-fold higher eosinophil count compared to those homozygous for the G allele.[1] Beyond GATA2, other significant genetic regions include the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) region and the HBS1L-MYBlocus, both of which have shown associations with eosinophil counts and were replicated in various studies.[1] Previously reported loci like IL1RL1 and IKZF2also contribute to variations in eosinophil numbers.[1] Additionally, the RIN3locus has been linked to eosinophil and basophil counts, suggesting a complex polygenic architecture where multiple genetic factors collectively influence this trait.[2]Collectively, identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can explain up to 2.1% of the variation in white blood cell subtype counts, highlighting the substantial genetic contribution to eosinophil levels.[1]

Eosinophil counts are closely intertwined with the body’s immune responses and inflammatory conditions. Elevated eosinophil numbers are often observed in allergic inflammation, a process where eosinophils and basophils play coordinated roles.[1] This shared immunological function is underscored by the observation of overlapping genetic loci, such as GATA2, that influence both basophil and eosinophil counts, explaining up to 8.0% of the correlation between these two cell types.[1]The genetic predisposition to certain allergic conditions can directly impact eosinophil levels, as evidenced by novel asthma loci that are associated with both immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels and eosinophil counts.[2]Furthermore, variations in eosinophil numbers have been linked to the susceptibility and progression of specific comorbidities. Genetic variants affecting eosinophil counts have been associated with increased risk for conditions such as asthma and myocardial infarction.[5]These associations suggest that the genetic determinants of eosinophil levels are not merely quantitative but also have functional implications for a spectrum of immune-mediated and cardiovascular diseases. The intricate interplay between genetic factors regulating eosinophil production and their involvement in disease pathogenesis highlights the clinical relevance of understanding these causal linkages.

Modulating Factors and Complex Interactions

Section titled “Modulating Factors and Complex Interactions”

Beyond direct genetic determinants, various other factors contribute to the observed variation in eosinophil counts, often through complex interactions. Age is a recognized factor influencing eosinophil levels, and studies frequently adjust for it in statistical analyses to account for its modulating effect.[1]Similarly, lifestyle choices, such as smoking history, are considered in research as potential environmental influences on blood cell counts, although specific mechanisms for eosinophils were not detailed.[1] These adjustments in research indicate that environmental and demographic factors play a role, either independently or by modifying genetic predispositions.

The interplay between genetic background and environmental triggers, known as gene-environment interaction, is crucial in shaping the ultimate eosinophil count. While the provided studies primarily focus on identifying genetic loci, the consideration of factors like smoking history alongside genetic variants implies that an individual’s genetic makeup may interact with external exposures to modulate eosinophil levels. Such interactions could explain why individuals with similar genetic predispositions might exhibit different eosinophil counts depending on their environmental context and lifestyle. Understanding these complex influences is vital for a comprehensive view of eosinophil count regulation.

Eosinophils are a type of white blood cell, specifically granulocytes, that play a crucial role in the immune system, particularly in mediating allergic inflammation and defending against parasitic infections. Variations in eosinophil count can provide insights into both normal immune function and the pathogenesis of various diseases. Research into the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying eosinophil count helps to elucidate the intricate regulatory networks governing hematopoiesis and immune responses.

Hematopoiesis and Granulocyte Differentiation

Section titled “Hematopoiesis and Granulocyte Differentiation”

Eosinophils originate from hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow, undergoing a complex differentiation process that leads to their mature form. This developmental pathway is shared with other granulocytes, such as basophils, highlighting common lineage pathways in white blood cell differentiation.[4] Key transcription factors are essential for maintaining early hematopoietic cell pools and directing these cells towards specific myeloid lineages. The GATA2gene, for instance, encodes a zinc-finger transcription factor that plays an essential role in hematopoiesis, with a particular involvement in the regulation of both basophil and eosinophil development.[1] The influence of GATA2extends beyond specific granulocyte lineages, as genetic variations in its proximal region are also associated with monocyte counts, demonstrating overlapping regulatory roles across both granulocyte and non-granulocyte cell lineages.[4] This broad involvement underscores GATA2’s fundamental position in the early stages of white blood cell differentiation and its critical role in establishing the cellular composition of the blood. The coordinated development of basophils and eosinophils, which both mediate allergic inflammation, further suggests the existence of shared genetic factors influencing their counts.[1]

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several genetic loci significantly associated with variations in eosinophil count, revealing specific genes and regulatory regions that influence this trait. One prominent locus is theGATA2region on chromosome 3q21, where single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) likers4328821 have shown significant associations with both basophil and eosinophil counts.[1] The A allele of rs4328821 , for example, is associated with increased basophil and eosinophil counts, with individuals homozygous for this allele exhibiting significantly higher eosinophil levels.[1]This particular SNP accounts for a notable portion of the correlation observed between basophil and eosinophil counts, emphasizingGATA2’s pleiotropic effects in granulocyte regulation.[1]Other genetic regions also contribute to the regulation of eosinophil numbers. TheHBS1L-MYB locus, represented by SNPs such as rs9373124 , is another critical genetic determinant for eosinophil count, among other hematological traits.[1]This locus exhibits pleiotropic associations, impacting not only eosinophil count but also other white blood cell subtypes, total white blood cell count, red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels, thereby validating its substantial role in overall hematopoiesis.[1] Additionally, the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) region and other loci such as IL1RL1 and IKZF2have been identified as important genetic modifiers of eosinophil counts, further highlighting the complex genetic architecture underlying this trait.[1]

The genes identified in association with eosinophil count variations are implicated in diverse molecular and cellular pathways that govern their development, maturation, and function.GATA2, as a transcription factor, directly influences gene expression patterns critical for the maintenance and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells towards myeloid lineages, including eosinophil precursors.[4]Its regulatory role ensures the proper balance and production of various blood cell types, and alterations in its activity can lead to changes in circulating eosinophil levels. Similarly, theHBS1L-MYB locus is known for its broad involvement in hematopoiesis, suggesting that variants in this region may affect fundamental processes such as cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation across multiple hematopoietic lineages.[1] The MHCregion, a highly polymorphic area, harbors genes that are crucial for immune responses and antigen presentation, and its association with eosinophil count suggests a role in modulating immunological pathways that indirectly or directly affect eosinophil homeostasis.[4] While specific molecular mechanisms linking MHCvariants to eosinophil numbers are complex, they likely involve effects on immune cell interactions, cytokine signaling, or inflammation, which in turn can influence eosinophil production, trafficking, or survival. These genetic associations underscore the intricate interplay between developmental pathways and immune regulatory networks in determining circulating eosinophil levels.

Systemic Consequences and Pathophysiological Relevance

Section titled “Systemic Consequences and Pathophysiological Relevance”

Variations in eosinophil count have systemic consequences, reflecting both normal physiological states and underlying pathophysiological processes. Eosinophils are known for their coordinated role with basophils in mediating allergic inflammation, and the genetic correlation between their counts points to shared regulatory mechanisms important in allergic diseases.[1]Abnormal eosinophil counts can serve as biomarkers for various conditions, including allergic reactions, parasitic infections, and certain autoimmune or malignant disorders. Therefore, understanding the genetic factors that influence eosinophil count can provide valuable insights into the etiology and progression of these immune-related diseases.

The pleiotropic effects observed for loci like HBS1L-MYB and GATA2, which influence multiple hematological traits, highlight the interconnectedness of blood cell production and the systemic impact of genetic variations.[4] For instance, the HBS1L-MYBlocus’s association with a wide array of blood cell parameters suggests its fundamental role in overall hematopoiesis, where even subtle genetic differences can cascade into broad changes in blood composition. Elucidating these genetic associations and their molecular underpinnings not only enhances our understanding of eosinophil biology but also offers potential targets for therapeutic interventions in conditions characterized by dysregulated eosinophil counts.

Transcriptional Regulation of Hematopoiesis

Section titled “Transcriptional Regulation of Hematopoiesis”

The maintenance and differentiation of early hematopoietic cell pools, which give rise to various blood cell lineages, are critically regulated by specific transcription factors. Among these, GATA2stands out as a well-known zinc-finger transcription factor that plays an essential role in hematopoiesis, particularly in the regulation of basophil and eosinophil development.[4] Its functional significance lies in orchestrating gene expression patterns crucial for cell fate decisions and proliferation within proximal hematopoietic pathways. This involves intricate intracellular signaling cascades that, upon receptor activation, lead to the nuclear translocation of GATA2 or its co-factors, thus influencing the transcription of genes vital for granulocyte lineage specification.

The precise control exerted by GATA2 is fundamental for ensuring the balanced production of mature white blood cells. Dysregulation in GATA2activity or expression can alter the delicate balance of hematopoietic differentiation, potentially leading to deviations in eosinophil counts. The molecular interactions involvingGATA2 exemplify how transcription factor regulation serves as a primary control point in cellular development, influencing the overall white blood cell differentiation process.

Granulocyte Lineage Specification and Shared Genetic Factors

Section titled “Granulocyte Lineage Specification and Shared Genetic Factors”

Eosinophils and basophils are granulocytic cells that originate from a common lineage during white blood cell differentiation, indicating shared developmental pathways and regulatory mechanisms.[4]This common ancestry is underscored by the significant correlation observed between their absolute counts in blood, suggesting a degree of systems-level integration in their production. Research has identified genetic loci that are pleiotropically associated with both basophil and eosinophil counts, such as theGATA2 locus, the MHC region, and the HBS1L-MYB locus.[1] These shared genetic influences highlight pathway crosstalk and network interactions that govern the development of related immune cell types. The overlapping associations across granulocyte lineages, and even non-granulocyte lineages like monocytes in some cases, support the broader functional role of key regulatory genes in the overall white blood cell differentiation process. This hierarchical regulation ensures that the production of these functionally related cells is coordinated, contributing to the emergent properties of the immune system.

Genetic Variation and Eosinophil Count Modulation

Section titled “Genetic Variation and Eosinophil Count Modulation”

Genetic variations within specific genomic regions serve as critical regulatory mechanisms that directly influence eosinophil counts. For instance, a notable association exists at theGATA2locus, where the single nucleotide polymorphismrs4328821 has been identified.[4] Possession of the A allele of rs4328821 is associated with increased eosinophil counts, demonstrating a clear genetic contribution to the observed variability in these cell levels. Individuals homozygous for the A allele exhibit significantly higher eosinophil counts compared to those homozygous for the G allele.[1] This specific genetic variant within the GATA2 region, a known transcription factor, underscores how gene regulation can be modulated by common sequence variations. The rs4328821 locus alone can explain a significant portion of the correlation between basophil and eosinophil counts, illustrating the precise impact of genetic determinants on quantitative cellular phenotypes. Other loci, includingIL1RL1, IKZF2, the MHC region, and HBS1L-MYB, have also been associated with eosinophil counts, further demonstrating the complex genetic architecture underlying their regulation.[1]

Eosinophils are crucial effector cells of the immune system, playing a significant role in host defense and inflammatory processes. They are known to coordinately mediate allergic inflammation alongside basophils, contributing to the pathogenesis of various allergic diseases.[13]The functional significance of maintaining appropriate eosinophil counts is therefore directly linked to the body’s ability to mount effective immune responses while avoiding excessive inflammation.

Dysregulation of the pathways governing eosinophil development and activation can lead to altered peripheral eosinophil counts, which are often observed in disease-relevant mechanisms. For example, variations in eosinophil numbers are associated with conditions like asthma.[1]The interplay between genetic predispositions, such as those identified in genome-wide association studies, and environmental factors contributes to the variability in basal eosinophil levels and their involvement in systemic inflammatory and immunological responses.[14]

Genetic Determinants and Inter-Cellular Associations

Section titled “Genetic Determinants and Inter-Cellular Associations”

The eosinophil count is influenced by a complex interplay of genetic factors, with several loci identified through genome-wide association studies. For instance, theGATA2 locus, particularly the rs4328821 single nucleotide polymorphism, exhibits a significant association with both basophil and eosinophil counts, highlighting a shared genetic regulation between these granulocytic cells.[4] The presence of the A allele of rs4328821 is notably linked to increased counts of both basophils and eosinophils, with homozygous individuals for the A allele showing a 1.19-fold higher eosinophil count compared to those homozygous for the G allele.[1] This finding underscores the functional role of GATA2 as a crucial transcription factor in hematopoiesis, particularly in the regulation and differentiation of basophils and eosinophils.[1] Beyond GATA2, other genetic regions such as the MHC region, the HBS1L-MYB locus, IL1RL1, IKZF2, and RIN3have also been associated with eosinophil counts.[2]Some of these loci demonstrate pleiotropic effects, impacting multiple hematological traits. For example, theHBS1L-MYB locus, with the T allele of rs9373124 increasing eosinophil count, also influences the counts of other white blood cell subtypes, red blood cell count, hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, and inversely affects mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, mean corpuscular volume, and platelet count.[1] These broad associations suggest a foundational role of such genetic variants in general hematopoietic processes, extending beyond specific cell lineages.

Clinical Applications in Inflammatory and Allergic Diseases

Section titled “Clinical Applications in Inflammatory and Allergic Diseases”

Eosinophil counts, influenced by these genetic determinants, hold significant clinical utility as biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of various inflammatory and allergic conditions. Eosinophils and basophils coordinately mediate allergic inflammation, suggesting that genetic factors influencing their counts may predispose individuals to specific allergic responses or influence their severity.[1]Genetic variants affecting eosinophil numbers have been associated with conditions like asthma, indicating their potential role in disease susceptibility and presentation.[5]Further clinical associations extend to IgE levels and dermatitis, where specific genetic loci linked to eosinophil counts have been implicated.[2] Additionally, the RIN3locus, associated with eosinophil and basophil counts, has also been linked to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.[2]These associations highlight how genetic insights into eosinophil regulation can contribute to risk assessment, aiding in the identification of individuals at higher risk for developing or experiencing more severe forms of these inflammatory and allergic disorders.

The identification of genetic variants influencing eosinophil counts provides valuable tools for risk stratification and prognostic assessment in patient care. By understanding an individual’s genetic predisposition to altered eosinophil levels, clinicians can identify high-risk individuals for conditions where eosinophils play a pathological role, such as asthma and myocardial infarction.[5] For instance, individuals carrying the A allele of rs4328821 at the GATA2locus, predisposed to higher eosinophil counts, might warrant closer monitoring for associated conditions.[1] This genetic information supports the development of personalized medicine approaches, allowing for tailored risk assessments and potentially guiding early intervention or prevention strategies. The pleiotropic effects of certain loci, like HBS1L-MYB, which impact a wide range of hematological parameters alongside eosinophil count, offer a more comprehensive view of an individual’s overall hematopoietic health and potential long-term implications for various disease outcomes.[1]Integrating these genetic insights into clinical practice can enhance the prediction of disease progression and treatment response, ultimately leading to more precise and individualized patient management.

Frequently Asked Questions About Eosinophil Count

Section titled “Frequently Asked Questions About Eosinophil Count”

These questions address the most important and specific aspects of eosinophil count based on current genetic research.


1. My allergies are so bad this year; is it just me, or is there a reason?

Section titled “1. My allergies are so bad this year; is it just me, or is there a reason?”

It’s not just you; there can be genetic reasons for your allergy severity. Your eosinophil count, which is crucial in allergic reactions, is influenced by specific genetic regions. For instance, variations in genes likeGATA2can make you more prone to higher eosinophil numbers and thus potentially more severe allergic reactions or asthma. Your genes play a significant role in how your immune system responds.

2. If my parents have bad allergies, will my kids inherit them too?

Section titled “2. If my parents have bad allergies, will my kids inherit them too?”

It’s quite possible. Many aspects of your immune system, including eosinophil counts, have a genetic component. If your parents have allergies, it suggests a family predisposition, and specific genetic variants associated with eosinophil numbers can be passed down. This increases your children’s likelihood of developing similar allergic conditions, making early awareness helpful.

3. Could feeling stressed all the time mess with my immune system?

Section titled “3. Could feeling stressed all the time mess with my immune system?”

Yes, stress can definitely impact your immune system. While high eosinophil counts are linked to allergies, abnormally low counts (eosinopenia) can occur in response to stress or acute infections. This suggests that chronic stress could potentially alter your immune balance, making you more susceptible to certain issues or affecting how your body responds to allergens.

Yes, they absolutely can. Some medications are known to influence white blood cell counts, including eosinophils. If your doctor is monitoring your eosinophil levels for allergies or other conditions, it’s important to keep them updated on all your current drug treatments, as these could affect the accuracy and interpretation of your blood test results.

5. Why do some people never get hay fever, but I suffer every spring?

Section titled “5. Why do some people never get hay fever, but I suffer every spring?”

It often comes down to genetics. Your body’s tendency to produce eosinophils, which are central to hay fever, is influenced by specific genetic factors. Some people have genetic variations in regions like the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) or RIN3that affect their eosinophil numbers, making them less reactive or more resilient to common allergens compared to those with different genetic profiles.

Yes, your ethnic background can play a role. Many genetic studies on eosinophil counts have historically focused on specific populations, like those of European or Japanese descent, and findings can be ancestry-specific. This means that certain genetic risk factors for conditions like asthma or allergies might be more common or have different effects in your specific ethnic group, influencing your susceptibility.

If your doctor says your “allergy cells” (eosinophils) are high, it usually means your immune system is reacting strongly to something. Elevated eosinophil counts are a key indicator for various health issues, including allergic diseases like asthma, hay fever, or eczema, and also parasitic infections. It’s a significant diagnostic marker that helps your doctor understand what might be going on.

8. Could a DNA test help my doctor treat my allergies better?

Section titled “8. Could a DNA test help my doctor treat my allergies better?”

Yes, a DNA test could offer valuable insights. By identifying specific genetic variants known to influence eosinophil counts, a DNA test might help predict your individual risk for allergic conditions or even how you might respond to certain treatments. This information could contribute to a more personalized approach to managing your allergies, guiding your doctor’s choices.

9. My blood tests often show different immune cells are high together, why?

Section titled “9. My blood tests often show different immune cells are high together, why?”

That’s often due to shared genetic regulation. Your body’s immune cells, like eosinophils and basophils, can be influenced by the same genetic pathways. For example, a specific genetic variant in the GATA2 locus has been linked to increased counts of both eosinophils and basophils, which often show a moderate correlation, explaining why they might be elevated together.

Section titled “10. I heard about a link between allergy cells and heart issues – is that true?”

Yes, there’s research suggesting a connection. Studies have identified genetic sequence variants that affect eosinophil numbers and also associate with conditions like asthma and myocardial infarction (heart attack). This doesn’t mean high allergy cells directly cause heart issues, but it highlights shared genetic pathways that influence both immune responses and cardiovascular health, making it an area of ongoing research.


This FAQ was automatically generated based on current genetic research and may be updated as new information becomes available.

Disclaimer: This information is for educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a healthcare provider for personalized medical guidance.

[1] Okada Y, et al. “Identification of nine novel loci associated with white blood cell subtypes in a Japanese population.” PLoS Genet, vol. 7, no. 6, 2011, p. e1002067.

[2] Johansson A, et al. “Genome-wide association analysis of 350 000 Caucasians from the UK Biobank identifies novel loci for asthma, hay fever and eczema.”Hum Mol Genet, vol. 28, no. 23, 2019, pp. 3966-3977.

[3] Gudbjartsson DF, et al. “Sequence variants affecting eosinophil numbers associate with asthma and myocardial infarction.”Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 3, 2009, pp. 342-347.

[4] Nalls MA, et al. “Multiple loci are associated with white blood cell phenotypes.” PLoS Genet, vol. 7, no. 6, 2011, p. e1002068.

[5] Ferreira MA, et al. “Sequence variants affecting eosinophil numbers associate with asthma and myocardial infarction.”Nat Genet, vol. 41, no. 3, 2009, pp. 342-347.

[6] Gabryszewski, Stephen J., et al. “Unsupervised Modeling and Genome-Wide Association Identify Novel Features of Allergic March Trajectories.” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 146, no. 5, 2020, pp. 1100-1110.e10.

[7] Bunyavanich, Supinda, et al. “Integrated genome-wide association, coexpression network, and expression single nucleotide polymorphism analysis identifies novel pathway in allergic rhinitis.”BMC Medical Genomics, vol. 7, 2014, p. 48.

[8] Levin, A. M. et al. “A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for serum total IgE in diverse study populations.” J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2013.

[9] Benjamin, E. J. et al. “Genome-wide association with select biomarker traits in the Framingham Heart Study.” BMC Med Genet, 2007.

[10] Rubicz, R. et al. “A genome-wide integrative genomic study localizes genetic factors influencing antibodies against Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1).” PLoS Genet, 2013.

[11] Weidinger, S. et al. “Genome-wide scan on total serum IgE levels identifies FCER1A as novel susceptibility locus.” PLoS Genet, 2008.

[12] Aponte, J. L. et al. “Assessment of rosacea symptom severity by genome-wide association study and expression analysis highlights immuno-inflammatory and skin pigmentation genes.” Hum Mol Genet, 2017.

[13] Arinobu, Y., H. Iwasaki, and K. Akashi. “Origin of Basophils and Mast Cells.” Allergol Int, vol. 58, 2009, pp. 21–28.

[14] Evans, D. M., I. H. Frazer, and N. G. Martin. “Genetic and Environmental Causes of Variation in Basal Levels of Blood Cells.” Twin Res, vol. 2, 1999, pp. 250–257.