Digit Length Ratio
Introduction
The digit length ratio, commonly referred to as 2D:4D, is a widely studied anthropometric trait that describes the relative lengths of an individual's fingers. Specifically, it is calculated as the length of the second digit (index finger) divided by the length of the fourth digit (ring finger). [1] This ratio is often multiplied by 100 to simplify computational analysis. [1] Studies consistently show that females generally exhibit higher 2D:4D ratios than males. [1] The lengths are typically measured from photocopies of hands using digital calipers, a method shown to have high reliability and correlation with in vivo measurements. [1] The phenotypic correlation between left and right hand 2D:4D is also observed to be significant. [1]
Biological Basis
The 2D:4D ratio is considered a putative retrospective biomarker of prenatal testosterone exposure, suggesting its development is influenced by the fetal hormonal environment. [1] Research indicates that both genetic and environmental factors contribute to digit length ratios [2] with twin studies estimating its heritability . [3], [4] Genetic variants have been associated with 2D:4D, including a variant in the _LIN28B_ gene. [1] Other genes, such as _SMOC1_ and _SOX7_, have also been implicated, alongside nominal associations with variants near _POLG_ and in _NUP37_. [1] The androgen receptor gene itself has also been examined for its role in variation in the 2D:4D ratio. [5]
Clinical Relevance
Due to its proposed link to prenatal hormone exposure, the 2D:4D ratio has been investigated as a potential biomarker for various health and behavioral traits. It has been explored as a predictor of disease predisposition [6] and has shown associations with conditions such as delayed menarche. [7] Studies have linked the ratio to reproductive health, including sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and estrogen. [8] Furthermore, the 2D:4D ratio has been studied in relation to neurodevelopmental conditions like autism [9] and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. [10] It has also been used in research exploring visuospatial performance and sexual orientation. [11]
Social Importance
The digit length ratio has garnered significant public and scientific interest, leading to extensive research across various disciplines, as highlighted by scientometric analyses. [12] Beyond its biological and clinical implications, the ratio has been informally linked to aspects of personality and behavior, such as assertiveness in women. [13] Its role as a broad indicator of fertility, behavior, and health continues to be a subject of ongoing scientific inquiry. [14]
Methodological and Statistical Considerations
The genetic studies of digit length ratio, like many genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of complex traits, face inherent methodological and statistical limitations that can impact the interpretation and generalizability of findings. Initial GWAS for traits such as digit length ratio, which involved cohorts of around 1,382 individuals, may be underpowered to detect variants with small effect sizes, necessitating much larger sample sizes (e.g., 18,000 to 25,000 individuals) for robust discovery of common variants . This gene is also noted in broader genetic studies as a locus of interest for various traits. [1] The LIN28B gene, an RNA-binding protein, is directly associated with the 2D:4D finger length ratio, further strengthening its connection to prenatal testosterone exposure as a retrospective biomarker. [1] This variant's influence on digit length is robust, with genetic analyses showing its strong association even after accounting for other genetic signals in the region. [1] Beyond digit ratio, LIN28B is known for its critical roles in developmental timing, glucose metabolism, and has been linked to variations in age at menarche and natural menopause, as well as several human malignancies. [1]
Other variants implicated in developmental pathways that could influence digit length include rs847158, located near the HOXD13 and HOXD12 genes. These genes are part of the HOXD cluster, a collection of homeobox genes that are master regulators of embryonic development, particularly the patterning and formation of limbs and digits. Variants in these regions can profoundly impact skeletal morphology, making them highly relevant to the precise development of digit lengths and ratios. [15] Similarly, the rs10790969 variant is found near ETS1 and FLI1, two ETS family transcription factors involved in regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration during development. Genetic variations affecting the activity of these transcription factors could alter the growth and shaping of digits. [16] The rs4927012 variant is associated with GLIS1, a zinc finger transcription factor that plays a crucial role in early embryonic development and cell fate determination, with potential implications for overall growth and specific skeletal structures like digits. [17]
Further genetic loci of interest involve non-coding RNAs and pseudogenes, whose regulatory functions can indirectly affect developmental outcomes. The rs340600 variant is located in the LDAH gene, which is involved in lactate metabolism; while not directly linked to digit development, metabolic pathways can influence growth and cellular processes critical for digit formation. [18] Variants like rs11581730 (near EFNA3 and Y_RNA), rs6499762 (near HNRNPA1L3 and RN7SKP142), rs12474669 (near Y_RNA and LRRC2P1), and rs4799176 (near Y_RNA and LINC01896) highlight the emerging understanding of non-coding regions. Y_RNAs are small non-coding RNAs involved in various cellular processes, including RNA processing and stress responses, while lincRNAs like LINC01896 are known transcriptional regulators. [19] Pseudogenes such as HNRNPA1L3 and LRRC2P1 can also exert regulatory effects on functional genes. Variants in these non-coding elements can modulate the expression of nearby or distant genes, thereby influencing the complex genetic networks that guide digit development and ultimately impact digit length ratios. [20]
Defining Digit Length Ratio and its Conceptual Basis
The digit length ratio, commonly referred to as the 2D:4D ratio, is precisely defined as the ratio of the length of an individual's second digit (index finger) to their fourth digit (ring finger). [1] This anthropometric trait serves as a putative retrospective biomarker, theorized to reflect the levels of prenatal testosterone exposure during early fetal development. [1] Conceptually, variations in this ratio have been explored as an index for a range of human characteristics, including assertiveness in women, and as a pointer to aspects of fertility, behavior, and overall health . [13], [14] More specifically, a lower 2D:4D ratio has been linked to higher prenatal testosterone exposure and has been considered a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and oestrogen. [6]
The operational definition of the 2D:4D ratio involves a standardized calculation: the length of the second digit is divided by the length of the fourth digit, and this quotient is often multiplied by 100 to mitigate computational difficulties arising from the trait's naturally low variance. [1] This measurement is considered a marker for perinatal androgen action, reflecting the influence of sex hormones during critical developmental windows. [21] The trait's development, including sex differences in digital formula, is observed from infancy, suggesting its establishment early in life. [22]
Measurement Approaches and Methodological Standards
Accurate measurement of the digit length ratio typically involves specific methodological standards to ensure reliability and validity. A common approach involves photocopying participants' hands during a clinical visit, followed by the measurement of the second and fourth fingers from these photocopies using digital calipers, which are accurate to 0.1 mm. [1] The repeatability of these measurements is high, with strong correlations observed between in vivo measurements and those taken from photocopies (r > 0.97), as well as between digital caliper measurements and computer-assisted programs (r > 0.96). [1]
Research often considers measurements from both the left and right hands, or the mean of both hands, to provide a comprehensive assessment of the digit length ratio. [1] Studies have consistently shown that the distribution of this measure is typically normal, meaning no further data transformation is generally required for statistical analyses. [1] These rigorous measurement techniques are crucial for ensuring the integrity of research exploring the genetic and environmental influences on this trait, which has been investigated through studies involving monozygotic and dizygotic twins to estimate heritability . [2], [3], [4]
Biological and Clinical Significance
The digit length ratio holds significant biological and clinical interest primarily due to its hypothesized role as a retrospective biomarker for prenatal hormone exposure. This makes it a valuable tool for understanding the organizational effects of sex hormones on later-life traits and behaviors. [23] Beyond its association with prenatal testosterone, the 2D:4D ratio has been linked to various downstream phenotypes, including aspects of fertility and reproductive health [14] and has been explored in relation to physical fitness in both males and females, suggesting effects of prenatal androgens on sexually selected traits. [24]
Furthermore, genetic research has identified specific variants associated with the 2D:4D ratio, such as a variant in the LIN28B gene. [1] While some genetic variants like rs314277 have shown associations with height, and other studies have explored associations with age at menarche, a direct overlap in the direction of effect between variants influencing height and those affecting the 2D:4D ratio has not been consistently observed. [1] The trait's heritability has been established through twin studies, indicating both genetic and environmental influences contribute to its manifestation . [2], [3], [4]
Prenatal Hormonal Influences on Digit Development
The digit length ratio, specifically the ratio of the second (index) to fourth (ring) finger length (2D:4D), is considered a putative retrospective biomarker for prenatal exposure to sex hormones. [8] This ratio is thought to be established during a critical window of early fetal development, particularly around the time of hand and digit formation, and exhibits sex-specific differences from infancy. [22] A lower 2D:4D ratio is generally associated with higher prenatal testosterone exposure, while a higher ratio may indicate greater prenatal estrogen influence. [8]
The differential growth of the second and fourth digits is intricately influenced by the delicate balance of androgens, such as testosterone, and estrogens during this critical prenatal period. [21] These steroid hormones exert their effects by binding to specific receptors within the developing limb bud tissues, modulating gene expression and cellular processes like proliferation and differentiation that ultimately determine the relative lengths of the digits. This hormonal environment during gestation is crucial for establishing the observed sex differences in 2D:4D, with males typically exhibiting a lower ratio than females. [25]
Genetic Regulation of Digit Ratio
Genetic mechanisms play a significant role in determining the 2D:4D ratio, with specific genes identified as contributors to this complex trait. A variant in the LIN28B gene, for instance, has been associated with the 2D:4D finger-length ratio. [1] LIN28B is known to be involved in developmental timing and growth, and its association with digit ratio suggests an intricate regulatory network linking general growth pathways to prenatal hormone action. This gene's influence extends to other developmental traits, including age at menarche and height, highlighting its broad impact on human development. [1]
Another gene, SMOC1 (SPARC related modular calcium binding 1), is also implicated in mediating the relationship between prenatal sex hormones and digit ratio. [26] The SMOC1 gene's involvement suggests molecular pathways through which hormonal signals are transduced into cellular growth and patterning instructions in the developing limb. Furthermore, variations in the androgen receptor (AR) gene, which encodes the primary receptor for testosterone, have been investigated for their association with the 2D:4D ratio, indicating a direct link between genetic predisposition and the sensitivity of developing tissues to prenatal androgen exposure. [5]
Molecular Pathways and Cellular Mechanisms
The establishment of the digit length ratio involves complex molecular and cellular pathways orchestrated by various key biomolecules. Hormones like testosterone and estrogen act as crucial signaling molecules, binding to their respective nuclear receptors within target cells in the developing digits. This binding initiates a cascade of events, leading to the activation or repression of specific genes that control cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, and programmed cell death, thereby shaping the skeletal elements of the fingers. [21] The precise timing and localized concentrations of these hormones are critical for determining the final relative lengths of the digits.
Genes like LIN28B contribute to these intricate regulatory networks, particularly in controlling developmental timing and overall growth. LIN28B is an RNA-binding protein known to regulate the translation of specific messenger RNAs and modulate microRNA processing, thereby influencing cell fate decisions and proliferation. [27] Its association with digit ratio suggests its involvement in the molecular pathways that interpret and execute hormonal signals during limb development, potentially by fine-tuning the growth rates of individual digits. Disruptions in these intricate cellular functions, whether due to genetic variants or altered hormone exposure, can lead to variations in the observed 2D:4D ratio.
Systemic Consequences and Pathophysiological Relevance
The 2D:4D ratio, reflecting early prenatal hormonal environments, has been proposed as a retrospective biomarker for a range of later-life traits and health outcomes. Variations in this ratio have been linked to fertility, behavior, and general health, suggesting broad systemic consequences of prenatal hormone exposure. [14] Specifically, a lower 2D:4D ratio has been associated with higher sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone in adult males, while also being linked to delayed menarche in females. [8]
Beyond reproductive and developmental timing, the digit ratio has also been explored in relation to physical fitness, sexual orientation, and various disease mechanisms. [24] While the digit ratio itself is a structural trait of the hands, its utility as a biomarker stems from its connection to the fundamental hormonal programming that impacts numerous tissues and organ systems throughout development and into adulthood. This widespread influence underscores the importance of the prenatal hormonal environment in shaping individual predispositions to a variety of physiological and behavioral characteristics.
Hormonal Signaling and Developmental Timing
The development of the digit length ratio is significantly influenced by hormonal signaling during critical prenatal periods. Specifically, prenatal testosterone exposure is a key determinant, with the androgen receptor mediating its effects on developing digits. [1] Variations in the androgen receptor gene are associated with individual differences in the 2D:4D ratio, indicating that the sensitivity or activity of this receptor system directly modulates digit growth and patterning. [6] The delicate balance between fetal testosterone and estradiol levels during gestation is thought to establish the characteristic proportions of the second and fourth digits. [28]
Genetic Architecture and Regulatory Mechanisms
The genetic underpinnings of digit length ratio involve specific regulatory mechanisms, including the influence of genes like LIN28B. A particular variant within the LIN28B gene has been identified in association with the 2D:4D finger-length ratio, highlighting its role in this anthropometric trait. [1] LIN28B is recognized for its function in regulating developmental timing, suggesting that its impact on digit length stems from its broader control over growth and maturation processes. [27] Moreover, the heritability of the 2D:4D ratio has been demonstrated through twin studies, confirming a substantial genetic component contributing to its expression. [3]
Systems-Level Integration of Growth and Development
The digit length ratio arises from the intricate systems-level integration of hormonal signaling and genetic regulatory networks operating during fetal development. For instance, the established role of LIN28B in governing developmental timing [27] combined with the profound influence of prenatal testosterone [1] illustrates a complex interplay where genetic factors modulate the cellular and tissue responses to hormonal cues. This orchestrated, hierarchical regulation is essential for proper limb patterning and the precise control of digit growth, ultimately culminating in the observed digit proportions. The 2D:4D ratio itself represents an emergent property, reflecting the cumulative and integrated effects of these diverse pathways during a crucial developmental window.
Clinical Implications and Pathway Dysregulation
Dysregulation within the pathways that govern digit development, particularly those involving prenatal hormone exposure and key genes such as LIN28B, can lead to alterations in the digit length ratio. Significant deviations in fetal testosterone or estradiol levels, or genetic variations affecting their reception or downstream signaling, can result in atypical 2D:4D ratios. [1] The broader significance of genes like LIN28B is further underscored by its association with other developmental milestones, including age at menarche and age at natural menopause. [27] This connection suggests that the same underlying developmental timing pathways that pattern digit length also influence other critical maturational events, positioning the digit length ratio as a potential retrospective biomarker for early developmental exposures and subsequent health trajectories. [1]
Clinical Relevance
The digit length ratio, specifically the 2nd to 4th digit ratio (2D:4D), serves as a non-invasive morphological trait that has garnered attention for its potential clinical implications. This ratio, typically calculated from measurements of the second and fourth fingers, is thought to reflect aspects of an individual's prenatal hormonal environment. [1] Research explores its utility in risk assessment, understanding disease predisposition, and identifying overlapping phenotypes across various health domains.
Retrospective Biomarker and Developmental Insights
The digit length ratio (2D:4D) is considered a putative retrospective biomarker for prenatal testosterone exposure. [1] Variations in this ratio may reflect the hormonal milieu during critical periods of fetal development, which can have long-term implications for an individual's biology and health. This makes 2D:4D a valuable tool for research into the developmental origins of health and disease, offering insights into how early life exposures might influence disease susceptibility or phenotypic expression later in life.
The utility of 2D:4D as a retrospective biomarker allows for risk stratification, identifying individuals who may have experienced particular prenatal hormonal environments. Such stratification can inform personalized prevention strategies or targeted screening for conditions known to be influenced by early androgen exposure. While the measurement itself is non-invasive and highly repeatable, with high correlations between in vivo and photocopied measurements, and between different measurement techniques [1] its clinical utility lies in interpreting its associations with various health outcomes.
Associations with Neurodevelopmental and Reproductive Health
The digit length ratio has been associated with a range of neurodevelopmental and behavioral phenotypes. Studies have indicated a relationship between 2D:4D and conditions such as autism [9] as well as symptoms of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). [10] These associations suggest that 2D:4D could serve as a non-invasive indicator for individuals at higher risk for certain neurodevelopmental profiles, potentially aiding in early identification or understanding underlying biological pathways.
Beyond neurodevelopment, 2D:4D has also shown associations with reproductive health parameters. Research has explored its relationship with semen quality and sex hormones in men [29] and with age at menarche and natural menopause, particularly through shared genetic pathways involving genes like LIN28B. [1] Furthermore, the ratio has been linked to aspects of visuospatial performance and sexual orientation [11] highlighting its broad relevance to human development and physiology.
Genetic Underpinnings and Disease Predisposition
The genetic basis of the digit length ratio is being elucidated, with studies identifying specific genetic variants associated with 2D:4D. For example, a variant in the LIN28B gene has been linked to 2D:4D. [1] Importantly, LIN28B is also known to be associated with other significant health outcomes, including age at menarche and natural menopause [1] and has been implicated in cell transformation and various human malignancies, such as hepatocellular carcinoma. [27]
This genetic overlap suggests that 2D:4D might serve as a broad indicator of predisposition to a spectrum of conditions, extending beyond direct hormonal influences to include complex diseases with shared genetic architecture. While 2D:4D itself is a morphological trait, its genetic associations point to a prognostic value for identifying individuals at risk for conditions like certain cancers or reproductive disorders. Further research into these shared genetic pathways could refine risk stratification and lead to more personalized prevention and treatment strategies. [6]
Key Variants
| RS ID | Gene | Related Traits |
|---|---|---|
| rs2332175 rs11158820 |
SMOC1 | digit length ratio body height |
| rs340600 | LDAH | digit length ratio |
| rs314277 | LIN28B | body height age at menarche digit length ratio Alzheimer disease, cognitive decline measurement, Cognitive impairment BMI-adjusted waist circumference |
| rs11581730 | EFNA3 - Y_RNA | digit length ratio |
| rs6499762 | HNRNPA1L3 - RN7SKP142 | digit length ratio |
| rs12474669 | Y_RNA - LRRC2P1 | digit length ratio |
| rs4799176 | Y_RNA - LINC01896 | digit length ratio |
| rs10790969 | ETS1 - FLI1 | digit length ratio |
| rs4927012 | GLIS1 | digit length ratio |
| rs847158 | HOXD13 - HOXD12 | digit length ratio |
Frequently Asked Questions About Digit Length Ratio
These questions address the most important and specific aspects of digit length ratio based on current genetic research.
1. Did I inherit my finger lengths from my parents?
Yes, research from twin studies indicates that your digit length ratio, or 2D:4D, is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. This means you likely inherited some of the genetic predispositions for your finger lengths from your parents, alongside other influences that shaped their development. Genes like _LIN28B_, _SMOC1_, and _SOX7_ have been associated with this trait.
2. Does my finger ratio say anything about my personality?
While widely studied, the link between digit ratio and personality is largely informal and a subject of ongoing scientific inquiry. Some research has explored associations with traits like assertiveness in women. However, these are broad observations and not definitive personal predictions.
3. Can my finger ratio predict my health risks?
Your digit ratio has been investigated as a potential biomarker for various health predispositions. It has shown associations with conditions such as delayed menarche and is explored in relation to wider disease risks. It's considered a potential indicator, but more research is always ongoing.
4. Is my finger ratio linked to my reproductive health?
Yes, studies have explored connections between digit ratio and reproductive health markers. For men, this can include associations with sperm numbers and concentrations of hormones like testosterone and luteinizing hormone. For women, it's been linked to estrogen levels.
5. Why do women usually have different finger ratios than men?
Females generally exhibit higher 2D:4D ratios than males. This difference is considered a putative retrospective biomarker of prenatal testosterone exposure, meaning the fetal hormonal environment during development plays a significant role in shaping these ratios.
6. Could my finger ratio be connected to my focus or attention?
Research has explored the digit ratio in relation to neurodevelopmental conditions. Specifically, studies have investigated its association with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. It's part of a broader inquiry into how prenatal factors might influence brain development.
7. Does my finger ratio tell me about my brain’s spatial skills?
Yes, the digit length ratio has been studied in connection with cognitive abilities, including visuospatial performance. This suggests a potential link between early hormonal influences, as reflected in your finger ratio, and certain aspects of your brain's function.
8. Why do some people have a much shorter index finger compared to their ring finger?
The relative length of your fingers, particularly the index (2D) and ring (4D) fingers, is influenced by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Significant variation exists among individuals, with genes like _LIN28B_ and the _androgen receptor gene_ contributing to these differences, which are largely established during prenatal development.
9. Can my finger ratio give clues about my prenatal environment?
Your digit length ratio is considered a putative retrospective biomarker of prenatal testosterone exposure. This means it's believed to reflect the hormonal environment you experienced while developing in the womb, particularly the balance of testosterone.
10. Is my finger ratio something I can change?
No, your digit length ratio is primarily determined during prenatal development and is considered a stable anthropometric trait. Once your fingers have formed, their relative lengths do not change significantly with age or external factors.
This FAQ was automatically generated based on current genetic research and may be updated as new information becomes available.
Disclaimer: This information is for educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a healthcare provider for personalized medical guidance.
References
[1] Medland, S. E., et al. "A variant in LIN28B is associated with 2D:4D finger-length ratio, a putative retrospective biomarker of prenatal testosterone exposure." Am J Hum Genet, vol. 86, no. 4, 2010, pp. 519-525.
[2] Gobrogge, K. L., et al. "Genetic and environmental influences on 2D:4D finger length ratios: a study of monozygotic and dizygotic male and female twins." Arch Sex Behav, vol. 37, no. 1, 2008, pp. 112-118.
[3] Paul, S. N., et al. "Heritability of the second to fourth digit ratio (2d:4d): A twin study." Twin Res Hum Genet, vol. 9, no. 2, 2006, pp. 215-219.
[4] Voracek, M., and S. G. Dressler. "Digit ratio (2D:4D) in twins: heritability estimates and evidence for a masculinized trait expression in women from opposite-sex pairs." Psychol Rep, vol. 100, no. 1, 2007, pp. 115-126.
[5] Manning, J. T., et al. "The 2nd to 4th digit ratio and variation in the androgen receptor gene." Evol Hum Behav, vol. 24, no. 6, 2003, pp. 399-405.
[6] Manning, J. T., and P. E. Bundred. "The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a new predictor of disease predisposition?" Med Hypotheses, vol. 54, no. 5, 2000, pp. 855-857.
[7] Loibl, L. M., et al. "Low digit ratio (2D:4D) is associated with delayed menarche." Am J Hum Biol, vol. 20, no. 4, 2008, pp. 487-489.
[8] Manning, J. T., et al. "The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen." Hum Reprod, vol. 13, no. 11, 1998, pp. 3000-3004.
[9] Manning, J. T., et al. "The 2nd to 4th digit ratio and autism." Dev Med Child Neurol, vol. 43, no. 3, 2001, pp. 160-164.
[10] Stevenson, J. C., et al. "Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms and digit ratios in a college sample." Am J Hum Biol, vol. 19, no. 1, 2007, pp. 41-50.
[11] Collaer, M. L., et al. "Visuospatial performance on an internet line judgment task and poten-tial hormonal markers: sex, sexual orientation, and 2D:4D." Arch Sex Behav, vol. 36, no. 2, 2007, pp. 177-192.
[12] Voracek, M., and L. M. Loibl. "Scientometric analysis of 2D:4D digit ratio research." Psychol Rep, vol. 104, no. 3, 2009, pp. 922-956.
[13] Wilson, G. D. "Finger length as an index of assertiveness in women." Pers Individ Dif, vol. 4, no. 1, 1983, pp. 111-112.
[14] Manning, J. T. Digit Ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior, and health. Rutgers University Press, 2002.
[15] Soler Artigas, M, et al. "Genome-wide association and large-scale follow up identifies 16 new loci influencing lung function." Nat Genet, vol. 43, no. 11, Oct. 2011, pp. 1082-90. PMID: 21946350.
[16] Ramdas, WD, et al. "A genome-wide association study of optic disc parameters." PLoS Genet, vol. 6, no. 6, 10 Jun. 2010, p. e1000978. PMID: 20548946.
[17] Cheng, Ching-Yu, et al. "Nine loci for ocular axial length identified through genome-wide association studies, including shared loci with refractive error." American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 93, no. 6, 2013, pp. 1081-1094.
[18] Fox, CS, et al. "Genome-wide association for abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose reveals a novel locus for visceral fat in women." PLoS Genet, vol. 8, no. 5, May 2012, p. e1002695. PMID: 22589738.
[19] Wood, AR, et al. "Imputation of variants from the 1000 Genomes Project modestly improves known associations and can identify low-frequency variant-phenotype associations undetected by HapMap based imputation." PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 5, 23 May 2013, p. e64348. PMID: 23696881.
[20] Prescott, J, et al. "Genome-wide association study of relative telomere length." PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 5, 10 May 2011, p. e19637. PMID: 21573004.
[21] McIntyre, M. H. "The use of digit ratios as markers for perinatal androgen action." Reprod Biol Endocrinol, vol. 4, 2006.
[22] Malas, M. A., et al. "Fetal development of the hand, digits and digit ratio (2D:4D)." Early Human Development, vol. 82, no. 7, 2006, pp. 469–475.
[23] Rahman, Q., and G. D. Wilson. "Sexual orientation and the 2nd to 4th finger length ratio: evidence for organising effects of sex hormones or developmental instability?" Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 28, no. 3, 2003, pp. 288–303.
[24] Ho¨nekopp, J., et al. "Digit ratio (2D:4D) and physical fitness in males and females: Evidence for effects of prenatal androgens on sexually selected traits." Hormones and Behavior, vol. 49, no. 5, 2006, pp. 545–549.
[25] McIntyre, M.H., Ellison, P.T., Lieberman, D.E., Demerath, E., and Towne, B. (2005). The development of sex differences in digital formula from infancy in the Fels Longitudinal Study. Proc. Biol. Sci., vol. 272, no. 1571, pp. 1473–1479.
[26] Lawrance-Owen, A.J., et al. (2013). Genetic association suggests that SMOC1 mediates between prenatal sex hormones and digit ratio. Hum Genet, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 247-251. PMID: 23263445.
[27] Viswanathan, S.R., et al. "Lin28 promotes transformation and is associated with advanced human malignancies." Nature Genetics, vol. 41, 2009, pp. 724–28.
[28] Lutchmaya, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Raggatt, P., Knickmeyer, R., and Manning, J.T. (2004). 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. Early Hum. Dev., vol. 77, no. 1-2, pp. 23–28.
[29] Bang, A. K., et al. "A study of finger lengths, semen quality and sex hormones in 360 young men from the general Danish population." Hum Reprod, vol. 20, no. 11, 2005, pp. 3109-3116.