Cerebellar Volume

Cerebellar volume refers to the size of the cerebellum, a vital region of the brain located at the back of the skull, beneath the cerebral hemispheres. This structure plays a crucial role in motor control, coordination, balance, and certain cognitive functions. Variations in cerebellar volume can reflect underlying biological processes and neurological health.

Biological Basis

The development and maintenance of cerebellar volume are influenced by complex biological processes, including central nervous system (CNS) development and neuronal survival.^[1]Research, particularly in conditions like multiple sclerosis (MS), has explored genetic factors affecting overall brain parenchymal volume (nBPV), which includes the cerebellum.^[1] Specifically, genetic pathways related to CNS development, involving genes such as CNTN6, GRIK1, PBX1, and PCP4, have been implicated. ^[1]Glutamate signaling, with genes likeGRIN2A and HOMER2, also contributes to brain volume regulation. ^[1] The protein reelin is believed to impact neuronal survival and the layering of neurons in both the cerebral cortex and cerebellum, potentially affecting the threshold of neuronal plasticity required to avoid clinical manifestation of neurological damage. ^[1]

Clinical Relevance

Cerebellar volume is clinically relevant as a marker for brain health, especially in neurodegenerative conditions such as multiple sclerosis.^[1]In MS, changes in brain parenchymal volume, which encompass cerebellar volume, are quantified using sophisticated imaging techniques like SIENAX from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. These measurements are normalized for individual head size to ensure accurate comparisons.^[1]Reduced brain parenchymal volume, often referred to as brain atrophy, is a significant clinical phenotype in MS and can be associated with disease progression and neurological damage.^[1] Genes such as NLGN1, HIP2, and CDH10have been linked to brain atrophy, suggesting their roles in facilitating the “homeostatic” maintenance of brain function during disease.^[1]

Social Importance

Understanding the genetic and biological factors that influence cerebellar volume holds significant social importance. Insights gained from such research can contribute to the development of improved diagnostic tools and prognostic indicators for neurological disorders. Furthermore, identifying genetic associations can guide the discovery of novel therapeutic targets, ultimately leading to more effective treatments and prevention strategies for conditions characterized by cerebellar atrophy or dysfunction.

Limitations

Methodological and Statistical Constraints

Research into cerebellar volume, particularly through genome-wide association studies (GWAS), is subject to several methodological and statistical limitations that influence the interpretation and robustness of findings. A common challenge arises from inadequate statistical power due to moderate sample sizes, which can lead to false negative findings and an inability to detect genetic variants with modest effect sizes.^[2] Many initial associations may not achieve genome-wide significance, requiring them to be viewed as hypothesis-generating until robust replication is achieved. ^[3] Furthermore, studies often report effect sizes estimated from follow-up stages or only for significant variants, which can inflate the reported effect sizes, a phenomenon known as winner’s curse. ^[4] The partial coverage of genetic variation by genotyping arrays can also limit the ability to detect true associations or replicate previously reported findings, as the causal variant or linked SNPs might not be adequately captured. ^[3]

Replication of genetic associations across different cohorts remains a fundamental challenge. Discrepancies in replication can arise from several factors, including genuine false-positive findings in initial reports, differences in study design, or varying power between studies. ^[2] Even when associations are found within the same gene region, differing specific SNPs across studies can lead to non-replication at the SNP level, potentially reflecting multiple causal variants or complex linkage disequilibrium patterns. ^[5]This highlights the need for consistent and extensive replication efforts in diverse populations to validate initial findings and confirm the true positive genetic associations underlying cerebellar volume.

Generalizability and Phenotype Definition

The generalizability of findings concerning genetic influences on cerebellar volume is often limited by the demographic characteristics of the study cohorts. Many studies predominantly involve populations of specific ancestries, such as individuals of white European descent, or cohorts that are largely middle-aged to elderly.^[2] Such homogeneity can restrict the applicability of findings to younger individuals or those from other ethnic or racial backgrounds, where genetic architecture and environmental exposures may differ significantly. Additionally, the specific methods used for measuring brain volumes, such as interactive digital analysis programs or automated segmentation software, while standardized, may still introduce subtle variations or biases across studies. ^[1]The definition and measurement of “cerebellar volume” itself, as a complex quantitative trait, may vary in precision and scope, impacting the comparability and interpretability of results across different research contexts. Cohort-specific biases, such as survival bias in studies where DNA collection occurs at later examinations, can further skew genetic associations.^[2]

Environmental and Genetic Complexity

The genetic architecture of complex traits like cerebellar volume is intricate, and current research often overlooks or cannot fully account for critical confounding factors. Gene-environment (GxE) interactions are a significant limitation, as genetic variants may exert their influence on cerebellar volume in a context-specific manner, modulated by various environmental factors such as diet, lifestyle, or co-morbidities.^[3]The absence of comprehensive investigations into these interactions means that the reported genetic effects might be incomplete or inaccurate, potentially overestimating direct genetic contributions while underestimating the role of environmental modifiers. Furthermore, the concept of “missing heritability” suggests that a substantial portion of the genetic variation for complex traits remains unexplained by identified common variants, indicating that rarer variants, structural variations, or more complex genetic mechanisms (e.g., epigenetics) may play a larger role than currently understood. Addressing these complexities requires sophisticated study designs and analytical approaches that integrate detailed environmental data and advanced genomic sequencing to unravel the full spectrum of genetic and environmental influences on cerebellar volume.

Variants

Genetic variations play a crucial role in influencing complex human traits, including brain structure and volume. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across various genes have been identified as potential contributors to neurological phenotypes, with implications for cerebellar volume. These variants can affect gene expression, protein function, or regulatory pathways essential for neurodevelopment and maintenance.^[1] Understanding their roles offers insights into the genetic architecture underlying brain morphology and function. ^[6]

Variations in genes like SLC39A8 and BANK1 are of particular interest due to their diverse cellular functions. SLC39A8encodes a zinc transporter, critical for maintaining cellular zinc homeostasis, a process vital for brain development, neuronal signaling, and antioxidant defense. SNPs such asrs13107325 , rs13135092 , and rs34333163 within SLC39A8may alter zinc transport efficiency, potentially affecting neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity, which could influence overall brain development and cerebellar volume.^[7] Similarly, BANK1 (B-cell scaffold protein with ankyrin repeats 1) is involved in B-cell receptor signaling, and while primarily associated with immune function, its variants like rs34592089 or the intergenic rs6855246 (located between BANK1 and SLC39A8) could indirectly impact brain health through inflammatory pathways or by influencing nearby gene regulation, thereby potentially affecting neuronal integrity and cerebellar morphology. ^[8]

The IGF1gene, encoding Insulin-like Growth Factor 1, is a well-established neurotrophic factor crucial for brain growth, neuronal survival, and synaptic function. Variants likers11111278 and rs5742632 , which are associated with IGF1 and the long intergenic non-coding RNA LINC02456, could modulate IGF1expression or signaling efficiency, thereby impacting neurodevelopmental processes and potentially influencing cerebellar volume.^[4] PAPPA(Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein A) is an enzyme that cleaves insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins, increasing the bioavailability ofIGF1. Variants such as rs72754248 , rs1885983 , and rs1160248 in PAPPA could alter IGF1 availability, leading to downstream effects on brain growth and maturation, including the cerebellum. ^[9] Furthermore, the LHX1-DT gene (LIM Homeobox 1 Divergent Transcript) and LINC00485 are lncRNAs that can regulate gene expression. Variants in LHX1-DT (rs8064679 , rs58249358 , rs8070356 ) and LINC00485 (rs703547 , rs703545 ), especially in proximity to IGF1, could affect the expression of key developmental genes, thereby influencing cerebellar development. The gene C1orf185, with variant rs142355453 , also represents a potential locus whose function, while less characterized in neurodevelopment, could contribute to the complex genetic landscape influencing brain structure. ^[10]

Key Variants

RS ID	Gene	Related Traits
rs13107325 rs13135092	SLC39A8	body mass index diastolic blood pressure systolic blood pressure high density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement mean arterial pressure
rs72754248 rs1885983	PAPPA	cerebellar volume measurement brain volume brain attribute brain attribute, neuroimaging measurement brain volume, neuroimaging measurement
rs34333163	SLC39A8	serum albumin amount apolipoprotein A 1 measurement aspartate aminotransferase measurement total cholesterol measurement calcium measurement
rs6855246	BANK1 - SLC39A8	intelligence von Willebrand factor quality autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia brain volume cerebral cortex area attribute
rs34592089	BANK1	intelligence cortical thickness serum albumin amount apolipoprotein A 1 measurement aspartate aminotransferase measurement
rs11111278 rs5742632	IGF1, LINC02456	brain volume cerebellar volume measurement
rs142355453	C1orf185	cerebellar volume measurement
rs8064679 rs58249358 rs8070356	LHX1-DT	brain volume brain attribute cerebellar volume measurement
rs1160248	PAPPA	cerebellar volume measurement brain volume
rs703547 rs703545	IGF1 - LINC00485	cerebellar volume measurement

Causes of Cerebellar Volume

Cerebellar volume, a key indicator of brain health and function, is influenced by a complex interplay of genetic, developmental, environmental, and disease-related factors. Variations in these elements can lead to differences in cerebellar size, impacting neurological processes and overall brain architecture.

Genetic Architecture of Cerebellar Volume

The size of the cerebellum, as part of overall brain parenchymal volume, is significantly shaped by an individual’s genetic makeup. Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous genetic loci implicated in brain volume, often involving genes critical for neuronal structure, function, and development. For instance, genes associated with “CNS development” such asMOG, PARK2, SH3GL2, ZIC1, CHST9, JRKL, CNTN6, GRIK1, PBX1, and PCP4 play fundamental roles in the formation and maturation of brain regions, including the cerebellum. ^[1]Similarly, genes involved in key cellular signaling pathways, like the glutamate signaling pathway (GRIN2A, HOMER2), calcium-mediated signaling (EGFR, PIP5K3, MCTP2), and G-protein signaling (DGKG, EDNRB, EGFR), contribute to neuronal communication and plasticity, thereby influencing brain volume. ^[1]

Further genetic contributions to cerebellar volume arise from genes that regulate the intricate processes of brain development and maintenance. Genes involved in “Axon guidance” such asSLIT2 and NRXN1, and those in the “Regulation of cell migration” like JAG1 and EGFR, are crucial for the proper wiring and organization of neuronal networks within the cerebellum. ^[1] Factors facilitating the homeostatic maintenance of brain function, including NLGN1, HIP2, and CDH10, have been associated with brain atrophy, suggesting their importance in preserving brain volume and integrity.^[1] The protein reelin is specifically recognized for its role in neuronal survival and the precise layering of neurons in both the cerebral cortex and cerebellum, directly influencing the structural development of these regions. ^[1]

Developmental and Epigenetic Influences

Early life events and developmental programming profoundly impact cerebellar volume. Genes critical for broad “CNS development” and “Embryonic development,” such asFUT8 and KLF4, orchestrate the initial stages of brain formation, setting the foundation for subsequent growth and architecture. ^[1]The proper execution of these developmental programs is essential for achieving optimal cerebellar size and function.

The protein reelin exemplifies a critical developmental influence. Beyond its role in neuronal layering, reelin is thought to affect the threshold of neuronal plasticity, which is the brain’s ability to adapt and reorganize. ^[1] This plasticity can be influenced by early life experiences and genetic predispositions, potentially determining how well the cerebellum can maintain its volume and function in response to various challenges throughout life. Early life influences, therefore, establish a foundational capacity for neuronal resilience and structural integrity in the cerebellum.

Environmental Modulators and Gene-Environment Interactions

Environmental factors can modulate cerebellar volume, although specific direct mechanisms are often complex and multifactorial. Geographic origin or population-specific environmental exposures, for instance, have been considered as covariates in studies assessing brain volume, implying that regional differences or lifestyle variations could contribute to observed differences.^[1]While specific environmental factors like diet or exposure are not detailed, the acknowledgement of geographic influences suggests that broader environmental contexts play a role in shaping brain characteristics.

The interplay between genetic predispositions and environmental triggers, known as gene-environment interactions, is also a significant determinant of complex traits, including brain volume. Studies in related areas, such as metabolic traits, have investigated how genetic effects can be modulated by continuous covariates like early growth or gestational age. ^[5]This indicates that an individual’s genetic susceptibility to variations in cerebellar volume may be either amplified or mitigated by specific environmental contexts, highlighting the dynamic relationship between nature and nurture in shaping brain structure.

Comorbidities and Age-Related Changes

Various comorbidities can significantly impact cerebellar volume, often leading to atrophy. In conditions like Multiple Sclerosis (MS), “brain atrophy” is a recognized clinical phenotype, with specific genes such asNLGN1, HIP2, and CDH10 being associated with this decline in brain volume. ^[1] The presence of T2 lesions in MS, which represent areas of demyelination and inflammation, also correlates with changes in brain volume, underscoring the impact of neurological diseases on cerebellar integrity. ^[1]

Beyond disease states, cerebellar volume is subject to age-related changes. The natural aging process often involves a gradual decrease in brain volume, including that of the cerebellum. While not explicitly detailed, the investigation of genes associated with “age of onset” for neurological symptoms indirectly suggests an influence on the trajectory of brain volume changes over a lifespan.^[1] The concept of neuronal plasticity, influenced by factors like reelin, also points to the brain’s capacity to resist or succumb to age-related neurological damage, which would manifest as changes in volume. ^[1]

Biological Background of Cerebellar Volume

The cerebellum, a crucial brain region located at the back of the skull, plays a vital role in motor control, coordination, balance, and cognitive functions. Its volume can be influenced by a complex interplay of genetic, molecular, cellular, and environmental factors, with alterations often indicative of underlying neurological conditions or developmental variations. ^[1]Understanding the biological underpinnings of cerebellar volume involves examining its development, the molecular pathways governing its cells, the genetic programs that regulate its formation and maintenance, and how various disease processes can lead to structural changes.

Cerebellar Development and Structural Organization

The formation and precise architecture of the cerebellum are governed by intricate developmental processes, beginning with central nervous system (CNS) development and organ morphogenesis. Key genes such as MOG, PARK2, SH3GL2, ZIC1, CHST9, JRKL, CNTN6, GRIK1, PBX1, and PCP4 are critically involved in the broader CNS developmental program, influencing the differentiation and patterning of neural tissues, including the cerebellum. ^[1] Similarly, SPRY2, CITED2, ABLIM1, NPR1, and ZIC1 contribute to general organ morphogenesis, ensuring the correct shaping and sizing of brain structures. ^[1] The precise layering of neurons within the cerebellar cortex, essential for its function, is a complex process where molecules like reelin are thought to play a role in neuronal survival and positioning. ^[1]

Beyond initial formation, the structural integrity of the cerebellum relies on proper neuronal connectivity, which is established through axon guidance mechanisms. Genes such as SLIT2 and NRXN1 are implicated in directing the growth and pathfinding of axons, ensuring neurons connect correctly to form functional circuits within the cerebellum and with other brain regions. ^[1]These developmental programs are crucial for establishing the initial cerebellar volume and maintaining its complex organization throughout life, with any disruptions potentially leading to structural anomalies or altered volume.

Molecular Signaling Pathways and Cellular Functions

The dynamic regulation of cerebellar cells and their interactions is orchestrated by a network of molecular signaling pathways and fundamental cellular processes. Signal transduction, involving genes like FRS3, RASSF8, PDZD8, CPE, DAPK1, DOCK1, EDNRB, DKK1, RASD2, RAB38, RASGRP3, CNTN6, GRIK1, HTR7, KDR, OR51B6, OR51M1, OR51I1, PDE4D, PDE6A, RGR, VIP, SPSB1, IRS2, and PSCD1, is central to how cerebellar cells respond to their environment, grow, differentiate, and survive. ^[1]Specific pathways, such as the glutamate signaling pathway, mediated by receptors likeGRIN2A and scaffold proteins like HOMER2, are critical for synaptic plasticity and neuronal communication within the cerebellum, influencing its functional state and, indirectly, its structural properties. ^[1]

Intracellular signaling cascades, including calcium-mediated signaling and G-protein signaling, further regulate a multitude of cellular activities. Genes such as EGFR, PIP5K3, and MCTP2 are involved in calcium-mediated signaling, which is vital for neuronal excitability and gene expression, while DGKG, EDNRB, and EGFR participate in G-protein signaling, impacting cell growth, differentiation, and survival. ^[1] Cellular functions like migration, regulated by genes like JAG1 and EGFR, are essential during development for proper cell positioning and later for responses to injury. ^[1]Additionally, metabolic processes such as amino acid metabolism, involving genes likeEGFR, MSRA, SLC6A6, UBE1DC1, and SLC7A5, provide the necessary building blocks and energy for cerebellar cellular health and function. ^[1]

Genetic Influences on Cerebellar Architecture

The genetic landscape significantly dictates the development, structure, and maintenance of cerebellar volume. Numerous genes, through their specific functions and expression patterns, contribute to the precise formation and sustained health of this brain region. For instance, genes involved in CNS development and organ morphogenesis, such asZIC1, CNTN6, and GRIK1, directly impact the initial blueprint and growth of the cerebellum. ^[1] Variations in these genetic elements can lead to differences in overall brain parenchymal volume, which includes the cerebellum, by affecting cell proliferation, neuronal migration, or cell survival during critical developmental windows. ^[1]

Furthermore, genes that regulate molecular signaling pathways, including those involved in glutamate, calcium, and G-protein signaling, influence the ongoing plasticity and metabolic activity of cerebellar neurons. For example,GRIN2A and HOMER2in glutamate signaling, orPDE4D and PDE6A in general signal transduction, can modulate neuronal excitability and energy homeostasis, which are crucial for maintaining tissue health and resisting atrophy. ^[1]The coordinated expression of these genes ensures the complex regulatory networks necessary for cerebellar function, with genetic variants potentially leading to subtle or significant alterations in cerebellar volume over time.

Pathophysiological Processes and Volume Changes

Cerebellar volume can be significantly altered by various pathophysiological processes, including neurodegenerative diseases, developmental disorders, and disruptions in homeostatic mechanisms. Conditions like Multiple Sclerosis (MS) are associated with neurodegeneration and brain atrophy, impacting the cerebellum as part of the broader CNS.^[1]Atrophy, characterized by a reduction in brain tissue volume, can be observed in cross-sectional measurements and is a key indicator of disease progression.^[1] The observed effect of molecules like reelin on neuronal survival and layering in the cerebellum suggests that disturbances in these processes could lower the threshold of neuronal plasticity, potentially leading to clinical manifestations of neurological damage and subsequent volume loss. ^[1]

Moreover, genes facilitating the homeostatic maintenance of brain function play a crucial role in resisting disease-related volume changes. For example,NLGN1 (neuroligin 1), HIP2 (huntingtin interacting protein 2), and CDH10(cadherin 10) have been linked to T2 lesion load and brain atrophy, indicating their importance in preserving brain integrity amidst pathological challenges.^[1]Disruptions in these homeostatic mechanisms, whether due to genetic predispositions or environmental factors, can impair the brain’s ability to cope with stressors, leading to accelerated neuronal loss and a reduction in cerebellar volume.

Clinical Relevance

Cerebellar Integrity in Neurological Conditions

The cerebellum is a vital component of the central nervous system, fundamental for maintaining brain function through its structural integrity and organized neuronal layering. Research has speculated that genetic factors influencing neuronal survival and layering within the cerebellum, such as the _reelin_gene, are related to the age of onset of neurological damage in conditions like multiple sclerosis (MS).^[1] This suggests that the developmental status and health of the cerebellum contribute significantly to an individual’s capacity to resist the clinical manifestation of neurological diseases, potentially by affecting neuronal plasticity. ^[1]

Prognostic Value in Neurodegeneration

Changes in brain volume are recognized as important prognostic indicators in neurodegenerative diseases. While whole normalized Brain Parenchymal Volume (nBPV) is a directly assessed phenotype in studies on conditions like MS, the cerebellum, as a significant part of the brain parenchyma, inherently contributes to this overall measure. ^[1] Therefore, understanding the factors that influence cerebellar integrity, such as _reelin_’s role in neuronal layering, provides insight into potential long-term implications for disease progression and the prediction of outcomes.^[1]Monitoring such structural aspects, even as part of broader brain atrophy, could offer prognostic value for disease evolution and treatment response.

Clinical Applications and Risk Stratification

The evaluation of brain structural metrics, including components like cerebellar volume, holds potential for clinical applications in diagnostics and risk assessment. Although the provided studies primarily focused on overall brain parenchymal volume, the specific mention of the cerebellum’s involvement in MS pathogenesis through genes like_reelin_ highlights its relevance. ^[1]Integrating such insights could contribute to identifying individuals at higher risk for accelerated neurological damage or earlier disease onset, thereby informing personalized medicine approaches and prevention strategies. Further, monitoring changes in cerebellar components of brain volume over time might serve as a valuable strategy for assessing treatment efficacy and guiding therapeutic adjustments.

Population Studies of Cerebellar Volume

Population studies investigating cerebellar volume contribute significantly to understanding its genetic, environmental, and demographic determinants, as well as its epidemiological associations. While specific studies focusing solely on cerebellar volume may be less common, broader investigations into total brain volume or brain parenchymal volume often provide insights, given that the cerebellum constitutes a substantial portion of the brain parenchyma. These studies leverage large cohorts, advanced imaging, and genetic analyses to uncover population-level patterns.

Genetic Associations and Large-Scale Cohort Studies of Brain Volume

Large-scale cohort studies have been instrumental in identifying genetic factors associated with brain structural measures, including the broader “Brain parenchymal volume,” which encompasses the cerebellum. For example, research involving cohorts from the US and European sites has explored genetic links, identifying associations between Brain parenchymal volume and genes like GRIN2A and HOMER2, which are involved in the glutamate signaling pathway.^[1]These studies utilize sophisticated methodologies, such as estimating whole normalized Brain Parenchymal Volume (nBPV) using software like SIENAX, which extracts brain and skull images from structural MRI acquisitions and calculates total brain volume normalized for head size.^[1] The pooling of data from multiple international sites, as seen in these large-scale collaborations, significantly enhances statistical power, allowing for the detection of subtle genetic effects on brain morphology across diverse populations. ^[1]

Methodological Approaches and Generalizability in Brain Imaging Studies

The methodological rigor of population studies is crucial for the generalizability of findings related to cerebellar and overall brain volume. Brain MRI scans, typically performed on 1.5 or 3 Tesla instruments using common sequences and protocols, are foundational for acquiring high-resolution structural images. ^[1] Software packages like SIENAX are then employed for automated tissue segmentation and calculation of total brain volume, ensuring standardized and reproducible measurements. ^[1] Beyond imaging, genetic quality control procedures, including assessment of marker allelic frequency, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and population genetic structure through methods like STRUCTURE and principal component analysis, are vital for minimizing bias. ^[1] These comprehensive methodological considerations, applied across large cohorts such as the Framingham Heart Study or various European cohorts, ensure the representativeness and reliability of identified associations, contributing to a robust understanding of brain volume variations in the wider population. ^[6]

Cross-Population Comparisons and Epidemiological Insights into Brain Structure

Population studies frequently engage in cross-population comparisons and epidemiological analyses to understand variations in brain volume. For instance, some studies involve cohorts primarily of northern-European ancestry, while others, like the ARIC Study, include diverse groups such as Caucasian and African American participants. ^[1] These comparisons help identify potential ancestry-specific effects or geographic variations in brain structure. Epidemiological considerations, such as accounting for demographic factors like age, gender, and even the site of sample origin, are integrated into statistical models to minimize confounding and ensure accurate estimation of associations. ^[1] The collaborative efforts across numerous European population cohorts, spanning countries like Italy, the United Kingdom, Finland, Germany, and the Netherlands, further facilitate broad comparative analyses, shedding light on how genetic, environmental, and demographic factors might differentially influence brain volumes, including the cerebellum, across varied ethnic and geographic landscapes. ^[11]

References

[1] Baranzini, S. E. “Genome-wide association analysis of susceptibility and clinical phenotype in multiple sclerosis.”Hum Mol Genet, vol. 18, no. 4, 2009, pp. 767-778.

[2] Benjamin, Emelia J., et al. “Genome-wide association with select biomarker traits in the Framingham Heart Study.” BMC Medical Genetics, vol. 8, suppl. 1, 2007, S11.

[3] Vasan, R. S., et al. “Genome-wide association of echocardiographic dimensions, brachial artery endothelial function and treadmill exercise responses in the Framingham Heart Study.”BMC Medical Genetics, vol. 8, suppl. 1, 2007, p. S2.

[4] Willer, C. J. “Newly identified loci that influence lipid concentrations and risk of coronary artery disease.”Nat Genet, vol. 40, no. 2, 2008, pp. 161-169.

[5] Sabatti, C., et al. “Genome-wide association analysis of metabolic traits in a birth cohort from a founder population.”Nature Genetics, vol. 40, no. 1, 2008, pp. 132-138.

[6] O’Donnell, C. J. “Genome-wide association study for subclinical atherosclerosis in major arterial territories in the NHLBI’s Framingham Heart Study.”BMC Med Genet, vol. 8, suppl. 1, 2007, p. S4.

[7] Kathiresan, S. “Common variants at 30 loci contribute to polygenic dyslipidemia.” Nat Genet, vol. 40, no. 2, 2008, pp. 189-197.

[8] Wilk, J. B. “Framingham Heart Study genome-wide association: results for pulmonary function measures.” BMC Med Genet, vol. 8, suppl. 1, 2007, p. S8.

[9] Wallace, C. “Genome-wide association study identifies genes for biomarkers of cardiovascular disease: serum urate and dyslipidemia.”Am J Hum Genet, vol. 82, no. 1, 2008, pp. 139-149.

[10] Yang, Q. “Genome-wide association and linkage analyses of hemostatic factors and hematological phenotypes in the Framingham Heart Study.”BMC Med Genet, vol. 8, suppl. 1, 2007, p. S7.

[11] Aulchenko, Y. S., et al. “Loci influencing lipid levels and coronary heart disease risk in 16 European population cohorts.”Nature Genetics, vol. 40, no. 1, 2008, pp. 102-106.