Skip to content

Carboxypeptidase B

Carboxypeptidase B (CPB) is a type of exopeptidase, an enzyme that cleaves amino acids from the C-terminal (carboxyl-terminal) end of protein and peptide chains. This specific enzyme is known for its preference for basic amino acids like arginine and lysine at the cleavage site. Its activity is crucial in various biological processes, ranging from digestion to the regulation of inflammatory responses.

Carboxypeptidase B exists in different forms and locations within the body. One well-known form is pancreatic carboxypeptidase B, which is synthesized in the pancreas as an inactive precursor (procarboxypeptidase B) and activated in the small intestine. It works alongside other digestive enzymes to break down dietary proteins into smaller peptides and individual amino acids for absorption. Another important form is plasma carboxypeptidase B, also known as carboxypeptidase N (CPN). This enzyme circulates in the blood and plays a vital role in regulating the activity of various peptides involved in inflammation, blood coagulation, and complement system activation. For instance, CPN inactivates potent inflammatory mediators such as bradykinin and anaphylatoxins (e.g., C3a, C5a) by removing their C-terminal basic residues.

Variations in the activity or expression of carboxypeptidase B enzymes can have significant clinical implications. For example, deficiencies in pancreatic carboxypeptidase B can impair protein digestion, potentially leading to malabsorption. In the context of plasma carboxypeptidase N (CPN), its role in modulating inflammatory peptides means that alterations in its function could influence the severity and duration of inflammatory responses. Genetic polymorphisms affecting CPNactivity might therefore be associated with susceptibility to, or outcomes of, conditions characterized by inflammation, such as sepsis, autoimmune diseases, or cardiovascular disorders.

Understanding the molecular mechanisms and genetic factors influencing carboxypeptidase B activity contributes to fundamental knowledge in biochemistry and human health. This knowledge is important for developing diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies for a range of conditions, including digestive disorders, inflammatory diseases, and conditions related to the immune system. Research into these enzymes helps to unravel complex biological pathways and identify potential targets for drug development.

Methodological and Statistical Constraints

Section titled “Methodological and Statistical Constraints”

The reported genetic associations are subject to several methodological and statistical limitations that impact their interpretation. The moderate size of some study cohorts may have led to insufficient statistical power, increasing the likelihood of false negative findings and the inability to detect modest genetic associations.[1] Conversely, a significant challenge in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is the potential for false positive findings arising from the extensive number of statistical comparisons performed; many reported p-values were unadjusted for multiple comparisons, necessitating caution in interpreting significance thresholds and requiring external replication for validation. [1] Furthermore, the use of a subset of available SNPs in genotyping arrays means that some causal variants or genes may have been missed due to incomplete genomic coverage, limiting the comprehensiveness of the genetic landscape explored. [2]

The analytical approaches also presented limitations, such as the potential for inflated LOD scores from individuals with extreme biomarker concentrations, although efforts like Winsorization were applied to mitigate this. [1] Additionally, the focus on sex-pooled analyses, while reducing the multiple testing burden, may have obscured sex-specific genetic associations that could play a role in the trait’s biology. [2] The use of multivariable models, while important for controlling confounders, could also lead to missing important bivariate associations between SNPs and phenotypes. [3] These factors collectively highlight the need for independent replication in diverse cohorts to confirm the robustness and true effect sizes of any identified associations.

The generalizability of the findings is constrained by the demographic characteristics of the study populations. Many cohorts primarily consisted of individuals of white European ancestry, making it uncertain how the identified genetic associations would translate to or apply in other ethnic or nationally representative populations. [3] This lack of ethnic diversity limits the broader applicability of the results and underscores the importance of conducting similar research in more varied ancestral groups.

Phenotype assessment methods also present specific limitations. For instance, some studies relied on proxy measures for certain traits, such as using TSH as an indicator of thyroid function without available measures of free thyroxine or a comprehensive assessment of thyroid disease, which could affect the precision of the genetic associations with the true underlying biological state.[3] Challenges also arose when previously reported genetic variants were not SNPs or were not included in the HapMap data, precluding their assessment in the current GWAS and potentially missing known associations. [1] Moreover, for studies correlating gene expression with protein levels, the chosen tissue (e.g., unstimulated cultured lymphocytes) may not always be the most biologically relevant, potentially leading to a weak correlation between expression and protein abundance in the specific context of the study. [4]

Remaining Knowledge Gaps and Complex Genetic Influences

Section titled “Remaining Knowledge Gaps and Complex Genetic Influences”

Despite the advances made, significant knowledge gaps and complexities in genetic influences remain. The current studies, while identifying numerous genetic associations, often do not fully elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms, such as the potential role of copy number variations (CNVs) in explaining some findings, which requires further dedicated investigation. [4] The observed limited correlation between SNP-altered gene expression levels and protein levels for many cis-effects suggests that protein abundance is influenced by numerous post-transcriptional and post-translational processes beyond simple gene expression, indicating a more intricate regulatory landscape. [4]

This complexity points to the broader challenge of “missing heritability,” where identified genetic variants explain only a fraction of the phenotypic variance, suggesting that a substantial portion of the genetic contribution may be due to other factors not fully captured by current GWAS. These could include rare variants, gene-gene interactions, gene-environment interactions, or epigenetic modifications that are not routinely assessed in these types of studies. Addressing these remaining knowledge gaps will require integrating multi-omics data, larger and more diverse cohorts, and advanced analytical approaches to fully understand the genetic architecture of complex traits.

Genetic variations associated with the carboxypeptidase b (CPB1) trait encompass a range of genes involved in diverse biological processes, from direct enzyme function to cellular regulation and lipid metabolism. These variants can influence the expression, activity, or cellular context of carboxypeptidase b, an important pancreatic exopeptidase that cleaves basic amino acids from the C-terminus of proteins, playing a key role in protein digestion and the activation of certain peptide hormones and complement factors. Variations in theCPB1 gene itself, such as rs2331406 , rs2291671 , and rs13318853 , can directly affect the enzyme’s structure, stability, or expression levels, thereby modulating its efficiency in processing dietary proteins and regulating physiological pathways where carboxypeptidase b is active. Similarly, the intergenic variantrs72802342 , located between ZFP1 and CTRB2, may influence the regulation of nearby genes, including CTRB2, which encodes chymotrypsinogen B2, another key pancreatic digestive enzyme, thus potentially impacting the overall capacity for protein digestion.

Other variants affect genes with roles in fundamental cellular processes that can indirectly impact pancreatic function and enzyme secretion. For example, variants rs8058234 and rs7404039 in CBFA2T3, a transcriptional repressor involved in development, could alter the expression of genes crucial for pancreatic cell differentiation or maintenance. Similarly, rs686056 and rs4121392 within ARHGAP42, which regulates Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton, might influence cellular morphology, adhesion, and the efficiency of protein secretion from pancreatic cells. The rs1126464 variant in DPEP1could affect peptide metabolism, asDPEP1is a dipeptidase, potentially altering the availability of substrates for other peptidases like carboxypeptidase b. Furthermore,rs9482771 in RSPO3, a Wnt signaling pathway potentiator, might influence pancreatic development, regeneration, or the maintenance of its secretory capacity. [5]

Variants affecting lipid metabolism and cellular trafficking also hold relevance. The rs174544 variant, located in the FADS1 and FADS2 gene cluster, is critical as these genes encode fatty acid desaturases essential for synthesizing polyunsaturated fatty acids. This variant has been linked to lipid traits, and alterations in fatty acid profiles can significantly influence cell membrane composition, signaling pathways, and inflammatory responses, which are all vital for maintaining pancreatic health and the efficient secretion of digestive enzymes. [6] Additionally, rs17468284 in PSD3(Pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 3), a gene involved in membrane trafficking, could affect the intracellular transport and secretion of proteins, including carboxypeptidase b. The variantrs58079876 in CDH15 (Cadherin 15), a cell adhesion molecule, might impact the structural integrity and organization of pancreatic tissue. Lastly, rs17032925 , located within the LINC01798 - LINC01828region, involves long intergenic non-coding RNAs that can regulate gene expression, potentially affecting a broad range of cellular functions relevant to carboxypeptidase b activity and overall metabolic health.[4]

RS IDGeneRelated Traits
rs72802342 ZFP1 - CTRB2type 1 diabetes mellitus
blood protein amount
atrophic macular degeneration, age-related macular degeneration, wet macular degeneration
pancreas volume
pancreatic carcinoma
rs8058234
rs7404039
CBFA2T3blood protein amount
kin of IRRE-like protein 2 measurement
chymotrypsinogen B measurement
chymotrypsin-C measurement
glomerular filtration rate
rs2331406
rs2291671
rs13318853
CPB1carboxypeptidase b measurement
rs686056
rs4121392
ARHGAP42level of chymotrypsin-like elastase family member 3A in blood
level of carboxypeptidase A1 in blood
carboxypeptidase b measurement
serpin I2 measurement
trypsin-2 measurement
rs1126464 DPEP1diastolic blood pressure
hypertension
systolic blood pressure
body height
osteoarthritis
rs9482771 RSPO3erythrocyte count
hematocrit
hemoglobin measurement
blood urea nitrogen amount
high density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement
rs174544 FADS1, FADS2monocyte percentage of leukocytes
phosphatidylcholine ether measurement
body height
level of phosphatidylcholine
triglyceride measurement
rs17468284 PSD3chymotrypsinogen B measurement
carboxypeptidase b measurement
inactive pancreatic lipase-related protein 1 measurement
trypsin-2 measurement
rs58079876 CDH15chymotrypsin-like protease CTRL-1 measurement
carboxypeptidase b measurement
trypsin-2 measurement
rs17032925 LINC01798 - LINC01828chymotrypsin-C measurement
chymotrypsin-like elastase family member 2A measurement
level of chymotrypsin-like elastase family member 3A in blood
level of carboxypeptidase A1 in blood
carboxypeptidase b measurement

The provided research materials do not contain information specific to carboxypeptidase B.

No information regarding the pathways and mechanisms of carboxypeptidase b is available in the provided research.

[1] Benjamin EJ et al. “Genome-wide association with select biomarker traits in the Framingham Heart Study.” BMC Med Genet, 2007.

[2] Yang Q et al. “Genome-wide association and linkage analyses of hemostatic factors and hematological phenotypes in the Framingham Heart Study.” BMC Med Genet, 2007.

[3] Hwang SJ et al. “A genome-wide association for kidney function and endocrine-related traits in the NHLBI’s Framingham Heart Study.” BMC Med Genet, 2007.

[4] Melzer D et al. “A genome-wide association study identifies protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs).” PLoS Genet, 2008.

[5] Wilk JB et al. “Framingham Heart Study genome-wide association: results for pulmonary function measures.” BMC Med Genet, 2007.

[6] Kathiresan S et al. “Common variants at 30 loci contribute to polygenic dyslipidemia.” Nat Genet, 2008.